Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Human behavior

Exploring educational field sorting using genetics

Creative use of informed statistical genetics methods combined with large-scale genomic data has delivered insights about sorting into educational fields. This study has wide-ranging implications for geneticists, sociogenomicists and social scientists for what can be learned about society within genetic data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Principal component analysis reveals patterns of genetic sorting into different educational fields.

References

  1. Ross, C. E. & Wu, C.-L. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60, 719–745 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allmendinger, J. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 5, 231–250 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, P., Reay, D. & Vincent, C. British J. Sociol. Educ. 34, 637–643 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheesman, R. et al. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02391-z (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong, A. et al. Science 359, 424–428 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheesman, R., Ayorech, Z., Eilertsen, E. M. & Ystrom, E. JCPP Adv. 3, e12138 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdellaoui, A., Dolan, C. V., Verweij, K. J. H. & Nivard, M. G. Nat. Genet. 54, 1345–1354 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Okbay, A. et al. Nat. Genet. 54, 437–449 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, M., Luijkx, R., Pollak, R., Vallet, L.-A. & van de Werfhorst, H. G. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 49, 369–388 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai, N. et al. Nat. Genet. 52, 437–447 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J. J. et al. Nat. Genet. 50, 1112–1121 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Karlsson Linnér, R. et al. Nat. Genet. 51, 245–257 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganna, A. et al. Science 365, eaat7693 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wedow, R., Martschenko, D. O., & Trejo, S. Scientists must consider the risk of racist misappropriation of research. Scientific American https://go.nature.com/47TkPoU (2022).

  15. van de Werfhorst, H. G. & Kraaykamp, G. Sociol. Educ. 74, 296–317 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robbee Wedow.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.W. is a research fellow at AnalytiXIN, which is a consortium of health-data organizations, industry partners and university partners in Indiana primarily funded through The Lilly Endowment, IU Health and Eli Lilly and Company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wedow, R. Exploring educational field sorting using genetics. Nat Genet 57, 2946–2947 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02427-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02427-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing