Extended Data Fig. 6: Intestinal and liver CD8+ TRM cells generate systemic responses upon pathogen rechallenge.
From: Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells shape local and systemic secondary T cell responses

a, Graphic scheme depicts settings of rechallenge experiments with adoptively transferred TRM cells from liver and intestine. In brief, congenically marked TRM cells were FACS-purified from liver and SI IEL of LCMV-infected mice, respectively, and co-transferred into naïve recipients, which were challenged with LCMV two weeks later. The offspring of the virus-specific (Db GP33+) donor T cells was analyzed at 8 and >30 days p.i. b, Representative flow cytometry plots show expression of the congenic markers CD45.1 and CD45.2 to identify donor SI IEL TRM-derived (green), donor liver TRM-derived (turquoise) and host-derived (grey) cells within the Db GP33+ T cell population in the indicated tissues at 8 and >30 days p.i. c, d, Representative flow cytometry plots show (c) expression of CD44 and CD62L and (d) expression of CX3CR1 and KLRG1 on Db GP33+ SI IEL TRM- (left) and liver TRM-derived memory T cells (right) in spleen at >30 days after LCMV challenge. e, f, The frequency of (e) CD62L expression and (f) co-expression of KLRG1 and CX3CR1 within the offspring of donor TRM populations and host Db GP33+ cells were quantified. Two-tailed paired t-test, *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. g, Representative flow cytometry plots show expression of CXCR6 and CD69 on Db GP33+ secondary memory cells developing from donor SI IEL TRM (left) or liver TRM (right) cells after LCMV challenge. h, The frequency of TRM cells (CD69+ CXCR6+) within the donor populations was quantified. Two-tailed paired t-test. Combined data from two independent experiments (n = 9 or 10 mice). Symbols represent individual mice; bars represent the mean. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.