Extended Data Fig. 7: Bulk RNAseq analysis of T cells isolated from brains of MgΔIfnγr mice and littermate controls.

(a) Sorting strategy for isolation of CD25hi (Treg) and CD25− (Teff) cells from brains of MgΔIfnγr mice and littermate controls. (b) Normalized reads of selected genes from sorted CD25− (Teff) and CD25hi (Treg) cells extracted from B6/SJL MgΔIfnγr and control mice at REM stage of RR-EAE, representing Treg genes not changed between MgΔIfnγr and control. n = 6 individual mice per group, lines represent mean. (c) Normalized reads of selected genes from sorted CD25- (Teff) and CD25hi (Treg) cells extracted from B6/SJL MgΔIfnγr and control mice at REM stage of RR-EAE, representing genes significantly changed in Treg cells between MgΔIfnγr and control. n = 6 individual mice per group, lines represent mean. (d) GSEA comparison WT and MgΔIfnγr T reg cell transcriptomes with list of genes upregulated in WT CNS Treg cells vs. splenic Treg cells6. Normalized enrichment score (NES) and the false discovery rate (FDR) are shown in the enrichment plot. Normalized enrichment score = −1.04, FDR q-value = 0.34. This indicates that Treg cells from MgΔIfnγr brains do not acquire features of a CNS Treg signature.