Emerging virtual reality systems offer intriguing therapeutic possibilities, but their development and use should be guided by ethical priorities that account for the specific vulnerabilities of patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Anticipation and prevention of real risks of virtual environments in psychiatry
npj Digital Medicine Open Access 30 January 2026
-
Virtual reality for relaxation in intensive care unit patients: feasibility, acceptability and intervention adaptation
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Open Access 21 October 2025
-
Exploring the Frontiers of Technology in Forensic Psychiatric Youth Care: Ethical Challenges
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Open Access 06 September 2025
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References
Dascal, J. et al. Virtual reality and medical inpatients: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 14, 14–21 (2017).
Howard, M. C. A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Comput. Hum. Behav. 70, 317–327 (2017).
Freeman, D. et al. Automated psychological therapy using immersive virtual reality for treatment of fear of heights: a single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 5, 625–632 (2018).
Pot-Kolder, R. M. C. A. et al. Virtual-reality-based cognitive behavioural therapy versus waiting list control for paranoid ideation and social avoidance in patients with psychotic disorders: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 5, 217–226 (2018).
Klein Tuente, S., Bogaerts, S., van IJzendoorn, S. & Veling, W. Effect of virtual reality aggression prevention training for forensic psychiatric patients (VRAPT): study protocol of a multi-center RCT. BMC Psychiatry 18, 251 (2018).
Kellmeyer, P. Neurophilosophical and ethical aspects of virtual reality therapy in neurology and psychiatry. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 27, 610–627 (2018).
Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W. & Dodds, S. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Ganguli-Mitra, A. & Biller-Andorno, N. Vulnerability in healthcare and research ethics. in The SAGE Handbook of Health Care Ethics (eds. Chadwick, R., ten Have, H. & Meslin, E. M.) 239–250 (SAGE, 2011).
Hurst, S. A. Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22, 191–202 (2008).
Orji, R. & Moffatt, K. Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Inform. J. 24, 66–91 (2018).
Timmer, J., Kool, L. & van Est, R. Ethical challenges in emerging applications of persuasive technology. in Persuasive Technology (eds. MacTavish, T. & Basapur, S.) 196–201 (Springer International, 2015).
Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Morozov, E. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism (PublicAffairs, 2014).
Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change what We Think and Do (Morgan Kaufmann, 2003).
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) grant no. 13GW0053D to the University of Freiburg - Medical Center; and by the German Research Foundation (DFG) grant no. EXC1086 (BrainLinks-BrainTools) to the University of Freiburg. Author P.K. wishes to thank his friend Dr. med. Lorenz Lehmann (University of Heidelberg - Medical Center) for valuable inspiration in designing the figure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kellmeyer, P., Biller-Andorno, N. & Meynen, G. Ethical tensions of virtual reality treatment in vulnerable patients. Nat Med 25, 1185–1188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0543-y
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0543-y
This article is cited by
-
Anticipation and prevention of real risks of virtual environments in psychiatry
npj Digital Medicine (2026)
-
Virtual reality for relaxation in intensive care unit patients: feasibility, acceptability and intervention adaptation
Pilot and Feasibility Studies (2025)
-
A pilot study on treatment content in virtual reality-assisted aggression therapy at a maximum-security forensic psychiatric clinic
Scientific Reports (2025)
-
Exploring the Frontiers of Technology in Forensic Psychiatric Youth Care: Ethical Challenges
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (2025)
-
Clinicians’ perspectives of immersive tools in clinical mental health settings: a systematic scoping review
BMC Health Services Research (2024)