Fig. 4: Algorithm performance in detecting prostate tumors on validation sets and comparison to pathologists. | Nature Medicine

Fig. 4: Algorithm performance in detecting prostate tumors on validation sets and comparison to pathologists.

From: Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge

Fig. 4

a,b,c, The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithms relative to reference standards established by uropathologists shown for the internal (a) and external validation sets (b, c). b, US external validation. c, EU external validation. d,e, On subsets of the internal and US external validation sets, the sensitivity and specificity of general pathologists are also shown for comparison. d, International pathologists' comparison. e, US pathologists' comparison.

Back to article page