Table 2 Accuracy of TriVerity Bacterial score for the diagnosis of bacterial and viral infections

From: Clinical validation of an AI-based blood testing device for diagnosis and prognosis of acute infection and sepsis

(a)

TriVerity Bacterial band (score)

Clinically adjudicated bacterial infection1

Sensitivity

(%)

Specificity

(%)

Likelihood ratio

(80% CI)

Relative requency of result (% in band)

Probability of bacterial infection

(%)

Yes

(N)

No

(N)

Very High

(40–50)

165

12

35.9

95.5

8.04

(5.66–12.43)

24.3

93.2

High

(30–39)

107

25

23.3

90.7

2.50

(1.97–3.31)

18.1

81.1

Moderate

(21–29)

90

46

19.6

82.9

1.14

(0.94–1.42)

18.7

66.2

Low

(11–20)

85

92

81.5

34.2

0.54

(0.45–0.63)

24.3

48

Very Low

(0-10)

13

94

97.2

34.9

0.08

(0.05–0.11)

14.7

12.1

(b)

TriVerity Viral band (score)

Clinically adjudicated viral infection1

Sensitivity

(%)

Specificity

(%)

Likelihood ratio

(80% CI)

Relative frequency of result

(% in band)

Probability of viral infection (%)

Yes

(N)

No

(N)

Very High

(40–50)

105

8

59.3

98.6

40.93

(27.73–72.16)

15.5

92.9

High

(30–39)

25

33

14.1

94.0

2.36

(1.68–3.25)

8

43.1

Moderate

21–29)

22

79

12.4

85.7

0.87

(0.64–1.13)

13.9

21.8

Low

(11–20)

17

166

90.4

30.1

0.32

(0.22–0.41)

25.1

9.3

Very Low

(0–10)

8

266

95.5

48.2

0.09

(0.05–0.14)

37.6

2.9

  1. 1using consensus adjudication as the reference standard.