Supplementary Figure 3: ER-EDA effects not driven by sniffing | Nature Neuroscience

Supplementary Figure 3: ER-EDA effects not driven by sniffing

From: Altered responses to social chemosignals in autism spectrum disorder

Supplementary Figure 3

The extent of change in ER-EDA as a function of the extent of change in sniff airflow in ASD. There was a slight trend for increased sniff modulation to the smell of fear in ASD vs. TD. Thus, one could raise the possibility that this is driving the ER-EDA effects. To address this possibility, we tested for a relation between change in ER-EDA and change in nasal airflow in ASD, yet observed no relation (r = 0.033, p = 0.9).

Back to article page