Supplementary Figure 8: Modular organization of spine synapses in brain sections not subjected to CUBIC. | Nature Neuroscience

Supplementary Figure 8: Modular organization of spine synapses in brain sections not subjected to CUBIC.

From: Synaptic nanomodules underlie the organization and plasticity of spine synapses

Supplementary Figure 8

Neurons in mouse cortex were transduced with EGFP at P7 to label spines and dendritic morphology as described in Fig. 4. At P28-35, brain sections were fixed and labeled with antibodies for PSD-95 and vGlut1 (Online Methods). Spines were analyzed for PSD-95 (green) and vGlut1 (red) modules by imaging in 3D STED mode on a Leica SP8 3X instrument. (a) High-contrast images and corresponding 3D reconstruction of one-module (top panels) and two-module (bottom panels) spines. Scale bar, 0.75 µm. Spines in 3D-rendered images are shown as transparent in order to enable the visualization of PSD-95 puncta (green). Scale bars, 0.3 µm (top panel), 0.2 µm (bottom panel). Similar results were obtained using brain sections from three different EGFP-injected animals. (b and e) Quantification of the percentage of spines (n = 3 independent injection experiments/animals) containing single and multiple (b) PSD-95 and (e) vGlut1 modules (n = 156 spines). (c and f) Quantification of the average areas of individual (c) PSD-95 (n = 255 clusters, n = 87 (single), n = 90 (double), n = 54 (triple), n = 24 (quadruple), p = 0.1075, F (3, 251) = 2.050, one-way ANOVA) and (f) vGlut1 (n = 258 clusters, n = 85 (single), n = 90 (double), n = 63 (triple), n = 20 (quadruple), p = 0.0562, F (3, 254) = 2.55, one-way ANOVA) nanomodules. (d and g) Quantification of the total area of (d) PSD-95 (n = 87 (single), n= 45 (double), n = 18 (triple), n = 6 (quadruple), ***p < 0.0001, *p = 0.0414, F (3, 152) = 83.58, one-way ANOVA), and (g) vGlut1 (n = 85 (single), n = 45 (double), n = 21 (triple), n = 5 (quadruple), ***p < 0.0001, **P = 0.0002, *p = 0.0034, F (3, 152) = 53.01, one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD post hoc). (h and i) Plots of the relationship between cluster number and spine size. A positive correlation between (h) PSD-95 (green line, Pearson’s R2 = 0.5275, p < 0.0001, n = 156 spines) and (i) vGlut1 (red line, Pearson’s R2 = 0.4957, p < 0.0001, n = 156 spines) cluster number and spine size was observed. (j) A plot of the relationship between PSD-95 and vGlut1 nanomodules (Pearson’s R2 = 0.6224, p < 0.0001, n = 156 spines). Bar graphs show mean +/− SEM, with numbers of individual spines or clusters represented by dots.

Back to article page