Supplementary Figure 3: Responses to low and high frequencies in frequency-selective ROIs. | Nature Neuroscience

Supplementary Figure 3: Responses to low and high frequencies in frequency-selective ROIs.

From: Divergence in the functional organization of human and macaque auditory cortex revealed by fMRI responses to harmonic tones

Supplementary Figure 3

The values plotted here and in Supplementary Fig 4 were used to compute the selectivity values plotted in Figs 2c–f. The plotted responses are averaged across the two lowest frequency ranges and the two highest frequency ranges (averaging across harmonic tones and noise in both cases). Responses are plotted as a function of ROI size (percent of sound-responsive voxels). a,b Group data averaged across subjects (N indicates the number of human/macaques). c,d, Individual subject data. Each human subject (columns) was reliability-matched to each monkey (rows) by subsampling runs (N indicates the number of runs). For macaques, we used all available data. Error bars reflect one standard error (median and central 68%) of the bootstrapped sampling distribution. Bootstrapping was performed across runs for individual subject analyses, and across both subjects and runs for group data.

Back to article page