Table 3 Broods data of snowy plovers breeding in Bahía de Ceuta, Mexico, between 2006 and 2016.

From: CeutaOPEN, individual-based field observations of breeding snowy plovers Charadrius nivosus

Column

Data name

Description of data

1.

species

species of plover (all snowy plover ‘SNPL’ in this case)

2.

population

population at which brood was observed (all ‘Ceuta’ in this case)

3.

year

year during which brood was observed

4.

site

site at which brood was observed

5.

brood

unique identifier of brood (unique within year and within site). Broods originating from known nests retain the nest identifier found in the Nests table, whereas broods hatching from unknown nests have a negative identifier (e.g., ‘−2’)

6.

ID

a concatenation of year, site, and nest to make a unique brood identifier across sites and years

7.

easting

UTM easting of brood observation

8.

northing

UTM northing of brood observation

9.

utm

UTM zone of brood observation

10.

date

date brood observation was made (stored in the internal ‘Date’ format of R and represents the number of days since January 1, 1970, the ‘Unix epoch’. Converted easily in R using ‘as.Date(date, origin = “1970-01-01”)’)

11.

time

time brood observation was made (24 h format, e.g. ‘1633’)

12.

distance

estimated distance in meters between brood and observer

13.

degree

estimated bearing of brood relative to observer (i.e., the number of degrees in the angle measured in a clockwise direction from the north line to the line joining the observer to the brood)

14.

parents

parents attending brood at time of observation (‘0’ = no parent present; ‘1’ = one parent (not identified whether male or female); ‘2’ = female only (‘2+’ when female identified, whilst male’s identity was uncertain); ‘3’ = male only (‘3+’ when male identified, whilst female’s identity was uncertain, i.e., opposite of ‘2+’); ‘4’ = both present)

15.

male

color-ring combination of male observed tending brood. The scheme can be noted as XX.XX|XX.XX where X indicates a possible position for a color (or metal) ring, the full-stop marks the position of the knee-joint and the pipe divides the left and right leg. Thus the readout is “left above. left below | right above. right below”. See page 9 of ref. 25 for more details

16.

female

color-ring combination of female observed tending brood. The scheme can be noted as XX.XX|XX.XX where X indicates a possible position for a color (or metal) ring, the full-stop marks the position of the knee-joint and the pipe divides the left and right leg. Thus the readout is “left above. left below | right above. right below”. See page 9 of ref. 25 for more details

17.

chicks

number of chicks observed in brood. Because of temporary or permanent brood adoption, number of chicks can be larger than initial brood size at subsequent observations

18.

chick_codes

color ring combinations of all chicks observed (individuals seperated by a comma). The scheme can be noted as XX.XX|XX.XX where X indicates a possible position for a color (or metal) ring, the full stop marks the position of the knee-joint and the pipe divides the left and right leg. Thus the readout is “left above. left below | right above. right below”. See page 9 of ref. 25 for more details.

19.

brood_photo

indication if a photo of the brood was taken (‘1’) or not (‘0’)

20.

observer

initials of observer making brood observation

21.

comments

miscellaneous comments pertinent to brood’s observation

  1. These data contains information on the time and location of a brood observation, the identity and number of chicks seen alive, and the identity of the parents tending chicks. These data can be used to assess parental investment, brood home range, and chick survival, for example.