Table 3 Comparison of our crop water use (CWU) estimates with Chiarelli et al.24 for a set of selected crops.

From: Water footprints and crop water use of 175 individual crops for 1990–2019 simulated with a global crop model

Crop (with * if perennial)

Rainfed production

Irrigated production

Average CWU (mm)

Matching cells

Spatial correlation

Median of differences

Average CWU (mm)

Matching cells

Spatial correlation

Median of differences

Our study

Chiarelli et al.

Our study

Chiarelli et al.

Wheat

331

589

75.1%

0.38

−41.5%

406

778

86.5%

0.36

−46.2%

Maize

367

434

82.3%

0.36

−18.7%

461

627

89.1%

0.64

−27.1%

Rice

370

885

63.9%

0.11

−54.9%

562

935

90.3%

0.16

−35.5%

Barley

214

493

75.6%

0.09

−52.8%

325

455

85.0%

0.59

−28.1%

Sorghum

396

406

78.8%

0.55

−6.6%

549

638

80.4%

0.66

−12.2%

Soya bean

394

450

81.7%

0.50

−12.6%

471

634

88.8%

0.68

−23.9%

Potato

350

329

71.3%

0.63

+5.9%

453

568

85.1%

0.63

−20.9%

Sugar cane*

755

872

68.3%

0.66

−11.9%

1192

1291

89.7%

0.73

−6.7%

Oil palm*

908

1020

80.9%

0.60

−8.8%

1153

1532

44.2%

−0.32

−26.4%

Ground nut

412

397

75.2%

0.65

+6.0%

495

573

71.4%

0.60

−9.7%

Grapes*

353

498

42.6%

0.59

−31.5%

541

708

29.1%

0.73

−27.6%

Cotton

502

497

64.2%

0.47

−1.0%

696

842

89.9%

0.59

−15.5%

Coffee*

647

960

79.9%

0.43

−30.9%

824

1237

67.1%

0.37

−29.0%

Average

  

72.3%

0.46

19.9%

  

76.7%

0.49

23.8%

  1. The average CWU refers to the global non-weighted average, matching cells correspond to the percentage of our grid cells which have corresponding values in the other study, spatial correlation corresponds to Pearson correlation coefficients among the matching cells, and median of differences refers to the global median of grid-level differences relative to values provided by the other study. Grid cells with values below 50 mm are excluded from this comparison.