Table 5 Comparison of crop water use (CWU) estimates between local studies and corresponding values in our study for eight crops.

From: Water footprints and crop water use of 175 individual crops for 1990–2019 simulated with a global crop model

 

Crop (with * if irrigated)

Country

Location

Period(s)

CWU difference

Reference

1

Rice*

Philippines

14°14′ N, 121°26′ E

2008–2009

−5.3%

79

2

Rice*

India

29°43′ N, 76°58′ E

1994

−1.9%

80

3

Rice*

India

20°26′ N, 85°56′ E

2015–2016

+30.8%

81

4

Rice*

USA

39°21′ N, 122°05′ W

2007–2009

+9.3%

82

5

Rice*

China

32°21′ N, 118°68′ E

2015–2018

−12.5%

83

6

Wheat

+16.3%

7

Wheat*

China

39°36′ N, 116°48′ E

2005–2008

−2.1%

84

8

Wheat*

India

30°56′ N, 75°52′ E

2006–2008

+9.1%

85

9

Maize (corn)*

USA

36°69′ N, 108°31′ W

2011–2014, 2017

+6.1%

86

10

Maize (corn)*

USA

41°09′ N, 96°28′ W

2001–2005

+9.1%

87

11

Maize (corn)

+1.3%

12

Soya bean*

+3.5%

13

Soya bean

−8.9%

14

Soya bean*

USA

33°42′ N, 90°55′ W

2016

+13.3%

88

15

Seed cotton*

Syria

36°01′ N, 36°56′ E

2004–2006

+6.8%

89

16

Seed cotton*

China

85°49′ E, 44°17′ N

2010

−0.9%

90

17

Sorghum*

Spain

39°03′ N, 2°05′ W

2007, 2010

−3.1%

91

18

Sorghum

USA

36°13′ N, 97°10′ W

2011–2013

−0.6%

92

19

Sorghum*

USA

29°13′ N, 99°45′ W

2006–2008

+28.8%

93

20

Sugar cane*

Brazil

20°43′ S, 51°16 W

2016–2018

+21.0%

94

21

Sugar cane*

India

19°52′ N, 74°58′ E

2015–2016

+3.1%

95

22

Oil palm

Indonesia

4°16′ S, 105°36′ E

2017–2019

−0.4%

96

23

Oil palm

Malaysia

01°44′ N, 103°32′ E

2006

+0.1%

97

  1. CWU difference is relative to the value provided by the other study.