Table 5 Comparison of unit WF for 15 main crops to other global studies7,35 in cubic meters per tonne (m3/ton).

From: A global dataset of the national green and blue water footprint of livestock feeds

Crops

This study

Mialyk et al.

Mekonnen and Hoekstra

GWF

BWF

GWF

BWF

∆ GWF

∆ BWF

GWF

BWF

∆ GWF

∆ BWF

Barley

925

50

569

20

−38%

−59%

1213

79

−24%

−37%

Cassava

393

0.6

399

0

2%

−72%

550

0.0

−28%

0%

Groundnuts

2413

179

2553

36

6%

−80%

2469

150

−2%

19%

Maize

880

72

647

27

−26%

−63%

947

81

−7%

−12%

Millet

4572

63

3204

7

−30%

−89%

4307

57

6%

11%

Potatoes

162

37

140

16

−14%

−57%

191

33

−15%

12%

Rapeseed

1528

101

1244

34

−19%

−67%

1703

231

−10%

−56%

Rice

1230

299

892

253

−28%

−15%

1146

341

7%

−12%

Seed cotton

2374

936

1770

695

−25%

−26%

2282

1306

4%

−28%

Sorghum

3238

26

2977

11

−8%

−57%

2857

103

13%

−74%

Soybean

2118

35

1486

3

−30%

−92%

2037

70

4%

−50%

Sugarbeet

65

27

50

15

−24%

−43%

82

26

−21%

3%

Sugarcane

118

35

107

29

−9%

−17%

139

57

−15%

−39%

Sunflower seed

2582

63

1998

29

−23%

−54%

3017

148

−14%

−57%

Wheat

1080

245

841

122

−22%

−50%

1277

342

−15%

−28%

  1. Global values are production-weighted averages. Good agreement is expected for differences in WF in the range of ±30%37.