Table 3 Temporal comparison of the monthly RF, GLASS LAI of 9 urban sites during 2020, accompanied by corresponding images of each site, RF and GLASS LAI are the LAI of the pixel (500 m grid) where the flux tower is located and natural LAI is the weighted average of all-natural tree LAI within the 0.5° grid where the flux tower is located.
From: A global urban tree leaf area index dataset for urban climate modeling
Site name | Photographs and monthly LAI | Properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Eye level | LAI | |||
1. AU-Preston |
|
| Tree Type | BET |
%Tree | 22.5 | |||
%Impervious | 62 | |||
2. CA-Sunset |
|
| Tree Type | NET |
%Tree | 12 | |||
%Impervious | 68 | |||
3. PL-Lipowa |
|
| Tree Type | NET |
%Tree | 16 | |||
%Impervious | 76 | |||
4. SG-TelokKurau |
|
| Tree Type | BET |
%Tree | 11 | |||
%Impervious | 85 | |||
5. UK-Swindon |
|
| Tree Type | NET |
%Tree | 9 | |||
%Impervious | 49 | |||
6. US-Minneapolis |
|
| Tree Type | BDT |
%Tree | 38 | |||
%Impervious | 21 | |||
