Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Data
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific data
  3. data descriptors
  4. article
Spatially explicit datasets of pesticide inputs integrating 146 active ingredients in China from 2001 to 2022
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Data Descriptor
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 February 2026

Spatially explicit datasets of pesticide inputs integrating 146 active ingredients in China from 2001 to 2022

  • Bin Zhang1,2 na1,
  • Hongyu Mu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9737-27053,4 na1,
  • Hua Li1,2,
  • Siqi Gao1,5,
  • Yalan Zhou3 &
  • …
  • Wei An1,2 

Scientific Data , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 998 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental impact
  • Natural hazards

Abstract

The escalating environmental risks in China posed by pesticides necessitate precise management and supervision strategies, yet such a national-scale framework is hindered by data gaps. Till now, only statistics of aggregated pesticide inputs are available in China as the sum of inputs of hundreds of active ingredients (AIs), highlighting the need for an AI-specific agricultural input datasets. The dataset was developed through field surveys covering 1181 respondents and 12 crop systems and order-dependent relationship quantitation of crop-specific pesticide usage patterns, combined with multi-objective optimization to minimize provincial-level prediction errors, with official statistics serving as constraint conditions. This approach integrated crop-specific application trends, registration timelines, and spatial disaggregation to produce AI-specific input estimates at 5-arcmin resolution (2001–2022). We performed technical validation by predicting riverine concentrations and further compared with measurements. The generative dataset was designed to follow a computational framework and be updated annually based on pesticide application data from field surveys, offering data support for policy makers for sustainable pesticide management strategies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Identifying and characterizing pesticide use on 9,000 fields of organic agriculture

Article Open access 15 September 2021

Agriculture applications contribution to improve precise pest management in China

Article Open access 24 November 2025

Development of a spatial risk indicator for monitoring residential pesticide exposure in agricultural areas

Article Open access 27 May 2025

Code availability

The code for developing pesticide input datasets was processed by using the R software version 3.6.2 and is available on Github(https://github.com/CauJane/CPI_model).

Data availability

Pesticide input datasets are available on Figshare (https://figshare.com/s/d37f04c47d0f11d90922).

References

  1. Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671–677 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, Q., Rösch, A., Fedrizzi, D., Vignet, C. & Hollender, J. Bioaccumulation, biotransformation, and synergistic effects of binary fungicide mixtures in Hyalella azteca and Gammarus pulex: how different/similar are the two species? Environmental science & technology 52, 13491–13500 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eichelberger, J. W. & Lichtenberg, J. J. Persistence of pesticides in river water. Environmental Science & Technology 5, 541–544 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Bureau of Statistics, Annual data: Agricultural diesel and pesticide input. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0D0C&sj=2022, Accessed 1 February 2025.

  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pesticide Use. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RP, Accessed 15 April 2022.

  6. Stehle, S. & Schulz, R. Agricultural insecticides threaten surface waters at the global scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 5750–5755 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schulz, R., Bub, S., Petschick, L. L., Stehle, S. & Wolfram, J. Applied pesticide toxicity shifts toward plants and invertebrates, even in GM crops. Science 372, 81–84 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Maggi, F. H. Tang, F. N. Tubiello, Agricultural pesticide land budget and river discharge to oceans. Nature, 1–5 (2023).

  9. Zhang, B., Zhang, Q.-Q., Zhang, S.-X., Xing, C. & Ying, G.-G. Emission estimation and fate modelling of three typical pesticides in Dongjiang River basin, China. Environmental Pollution 258, 113660 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Z. et al. Pesticide risk constraints to achieving Sustainable Development Goals in China based on national modeling. NPJ Clean Water 5, 59 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shattuck, A., Werner, M., Mempel, F., Dunivin, Z. & Galt, R. Global pesticide use and trade database (GloPUT): New estimates show pesticide use trends in low-income countries substantially underestimated. Global Environmental Change 81, 102693 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maggi, F., Tang, F. H., la Cecilia, D. & McBratney, A. PEST-CHEMGRIDS, global gridded maps of the top 20 crop-specific pesticide application rates from 2015 to 2025. Scientific data 6, 170 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, F. H., Lenzen, M., McBratney, A. & Maggi, F. Risk of pesticide pollution at the global scale. Nature Geoscience 14, 206–210 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, H., Jing, L., Teng, Y. & Wang, J. Characterization of antibiotics in a large-scale river system of China: occurrence pattern, spatiotemporal distribution and environmental risks. Science of the Total Environment 618, 409–418 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J. et al. Contamination characteristics of organochlorine pesticides in multimatrix sampling of the Hanjiang River Basin, southeast China. Chemosphere 163, 35–43 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naumann, T. et al. Occurrence and ecological risk assessment of neonicotinoids and related insecticides in the Bohai Sea and its surrounding rivers, China. Water Research 209, 117912 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, X. et al. Organophosphorus pesticides in southeastern China marginal seas: Land-based export and ocean currents redistribution. Science of The Total Environment 858, 160011 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Y. et al. The profiling of elements and pesticides in surface water in Nanjing, China with global comparisons. Science of The Total Environment 774, 145749 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. J. Arrow, G. Debreu, “Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy” in The Foundations of Price Theory Vol 5, pp. 289–316 (Routledge, 2024).

  20. R. Chumacero, K. Schmidt-Hebbel, General equilibrium models: an overview. Series on Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies, no. 9 (2005).

  21. Barzman, M. et al. Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agronomy for sustainable development 35, 1199–1215 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Elliott et al., Integrated pest management (Springer Science & Business Media, 1995).

  23. A. Lotka, Elements of physical biology. Williams and Wilkins (1925).

  24. Pimentel, D. Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States. Environment, development and sustainability 7, 229–252 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lotka, A. J. Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 119, 12–12 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. D. Sterman, Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. MacGraw-Hill Company (2000).

  27. J. Forrester, W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Waltham MA, Pegasus Communications (1961).

  28. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, P. T., Rico-Martinez, R. & Rico-Ramirez, V. Effect of feedback loops on the sustainability and resilience of human-ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 426, 109018 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Škraba, A., Kljajić, M. & Leskovar, R. Group exploration of system dynamics models—is there a place for a feedback loop in the decision process? System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society 19, 243–263 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Population Census Office under the State, P. Department of, National Bureau of Statistics of China. Employment Statistics, Tabulation on the 2010 Population Census of the People’s Republic of China by County (China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2012).

  31. International Food Policy Research Institute, Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2010 Version 2.0. Harvard Dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PRFF8V (2019).

  32. Pesticide Testing Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, China Pesticide Information. http://www.chinapesticide.org.cn/zwb/dataCenter, Accessed 1 February 2024.

  33. J. Fox, S. Weisberg, An R companion to applied regression (Sage publications, 2018).

  34. Zhang, B. et al. Nationwide prediction of pesticide residual levels in soil: Implications on the resulting risk and prioritization framework. Environment International 197, 109355 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Database Collection of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.

  36. Use of agricultural diesel oil and pesticide, China (indicator code A0D0C) https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0D0C&sj=2022 (2022).

  37. L. You, U. Wood-Sichra, Z. Guo, J. Koo, Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2000 Version 3.0. 7. (2020).

  38. J. Koo et al., Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2010 Version 2.0. (2019).

  39. International Food Policy Research Institute, Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2020 Version 2.0. (2024).

  40. International Food Policy Research Institute, Global spatially‐disaggregated crop production statistics data for 2005 version 3.2. (2016).

  41. Pesticide input datasets at 5 arcmin in China from 2001 to 2022, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29125955 (2025).

  42. J. Reus et al. Comparing environmental risk indicators for pesticides-Results of the European CAPER project. in European CAPER (Centre for Agriculture and Environment), p 147 p. (1999).

  43. Berenzen, N. et al. A comparison of predicted and measured levels of runoff-related pesticide concentrations in small lowland streams on a landscape level. Chemosphere 58, 683–691 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Utami, R. R., Geerling, G. W., Salami, I. R., Notodarmojo, S. & Ragas, A. M. Environmental prioritization of pesticide in the Upper Citarum River Basin, Indonesia, using predicted and measured concentrations. Science of the Total Environment 738, 140130 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Report of Phase 1 of the Aquatic Risk Indicators Project. Agricultural pesticides and biocides, 18 June (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC3200804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21976205) and the China Scholarship Council (201913043).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Bin Zhang, Hongyu Mu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Wastewater Detoxication and Resource Recovery, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China

    Bin Zhang, Hua Li, Siqi Gao & Wei An

  2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Bin Zhang, Hua Li & Wei An

  3. Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences; National Academy of Agriculture Green Development; National Observation and Research Station of Agriculture Green Development (Quzhou, Hebei), China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Hongyu Mu & Yalan Zhou

  4. Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700, AA Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Hongyu Mu

  5. State Key Laboratory for Ecological Security of Regions and Cities, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China

    Siqi Gao

Authors
  1. Bin Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongyu Mu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hua Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Siqi Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yalan Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei An
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.Z. contributed to conceptualization, methodology, visualization, curated the data, and wrote the original draft. H.M. contributed to conceptualization, methodology, curated the data, wrote the original draft, and revised the manuscript. H.L. contributed substantially to the methodology. S.G. contributed to the methodology. Y.Z. contributed to the methodology. W.A. supervised this project, contributed to the conceptualization, and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongyu Mu or Wei An.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

41597_2026_6704_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary materials of Spatially explicit datasets of pesticide inputs integrating 146 active ingredients in China from 2001 to 2022

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Mu, H., Li, H. et al. Spatially explicit datasets of pesticide inputs integrating 146 active ingredients in China from 2001 to 2022. Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06704-7

Download citation

  • Received: 26 May 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 07 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06704-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Journal Metrics
  • Policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Data (Sci Data)

ISSN 2052-4463 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene