Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Data
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific data
  3. data descriptors
  4. article
Database for Prevalence and Determinants of Frailty in the Elderly with Quantifying Functional Mobility
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Data Descriptor
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 February 2026

Database for Prevalence and Determinants of Frailty in the Elderly with Quantifying Functional Mobility

  • Agnieszka Szczȩsna  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-82581,
  • Arslan Amjad1,
  • Monika Błaszczyszyn2,
  • Magdalena Sacha3,
  • Piotr Feusette4,
  • Robert Zieliński4,
  • Piotr Wittek4,
  • Wojciech Wolański5,
  • Mariusz Konieczny2,
  • Zbigniew Borysiuk2 &
  • …
  • Jerzy Sacha2 

Scientific Data , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 302 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Risk factors
  • Scientific data

Abstract

Frailty is a common condition in older adults, characterized, among other things, by impairments in gait and movement patterns. The proposed FRAILPOL repository addresses the critical gap in geriatric research by offering a comprehensive, open-access, five body-worn inertial sensors (ankles, wrists, and back of sacrum) signals recorded during the Time Up and Go test of 668 participants, community-dwelling older adults. The gait data, as well as the stride-based spatio-temporal parameters along with demographic and health-related information, including cognitive health data, have been grouped according to established clinical criteria into three classes (robust, pre-frailty, and frailty). The technical verification includes classification by reporting results for both binary (robust, frailty) and multi-class (robust, pre-frailty, frailty) classification using classical machine learning models with acceptable accuracy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Effect of a home-based physical rehabilitation program via virtual reality on the functional outcomes of frail older adults: a quasi-experimental study

Article Open access 04 February 2025

Several frailty parameters highly prevalent in middle age (50–65) are independent predictors of adverse events

Article Open access 22 April 2021

A database with frailty, functional and inertial gait metrics for the research of fall causes in older adults

Article Open access 25 August 2023

Data availability

The FRAILPOL dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7874411.

Code availability

The code is available at https://github.com/aabbasi-polsl/FRAILPOL_classification. This repository provides a modular Python pipeline for processing raw IMU data from wearable sensors, extracting gait parameters, and performing frailty classification (binary and three-class).

References

  1. Dlima, S. D. et al. Frailty: a global health challenge in need of local action. BMJ Global Health 9, e015173 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aguilar-Navarro, S. G., Mimenza-Alvarado, A. J., Yeverino-Castro, S. G., Caicedo-Correa, S. M. & Cano-Gutiérrez, C. Cognitive frailty and aging: Clinical characteristics, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential prevention strategies. Archives of Medical Research 56, 103106 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, H., Chen, X., Zheng, M., Wu, Y. & Liu, L. Research status and hotspots of social frailty in older adults: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 16, 1409155 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, D. H. & Rockwood, K. Frailty in older adults. New England Journal of Medicine 391, 538–548 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cunha, A. I. L., Veronese, N., de Melo Borges, S. & Ricci, N. A. Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in hospitalized older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing research reviews 56, 100960 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walston, J., Buta, B. & Xue, Q.-L. Frailty screening and interventions: considerations for clinical practice. Clinics in geriatric medicine 34, 25 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mulas, I. et al. Clinical assessment of gait and functional mobility in italian healthy and cognitively impaired older persons using wearable inertial sensors. Aging clinical and experimental research 33, 1853–1864 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vavasour, G. et al. How wearable sensors have been utilised to evaluate frailty in older adults: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 18, 112 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonato, P., Feipel, V., Corniani, G., Arin-Bal, G. & Leardini, A. Position paper on how technology for human motion analysis and relevant clinical applications have evolved over the past decades: striking a balance between accuracy and convenience. Gait & posture (2024).

  10. Ruiz-Ruiz, L., Jimenez, A. R., Garcia-Villamil, G. & Seco, F. Detecting fall risk and frailty in elders with inertial motion sensors: a survey of significant gait parameters. Sensors 21, 6918 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amjad, A., Qaiser, S., Błaszczyszyn, M. & Szczȩsna, A. The evolution of frailty assessment using inertial measurement sensor-based gait parameter measurements: A detailed analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 14, e1557 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jung, H.-W. et al. Screening value of timed up and go test for frailty and low physical performance in korean older population: the korean frailty and aging cohort study (kfacs). Annals of geriatric medicine and research 24, 259 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Albarrati, A. M. et al. The timed up and go test predicts frailty in patients with copd. NPJ primary care respiratory medicine 32, 24 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faller, J. W. et al. Instruments for the detection of frailty syndrome in older adults: a systematic review. PloS one 14, e0216166 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Minici, D. et al. Towards automated assessment of frailty status using a wrist-worn device. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 26, 1013–1022 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Álvarez-Millán, L. et al. Frailty syndrome as a transition from compensation to decompensation: Application to the biomechanical regulation of gait. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, 5995 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong, R., Rau, P.-L. P. & Yan, X. Application of smart bracelet to monitor frailty-related gait parameters of older chinese adults: a preliminary study. Geriatrics & gerontology international 18, 1366–1371 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fan, S. et al. Digital health technology combining wearable gait sensors and machine learning improve the accuracy in prediction of frailty. Frontiers in Public Health 11, 1169083 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abbas, M. & Jeannès, R. L. B. Acceleration-based gait analysis for frailty assessment in older adults. Pattern Recognition Letters 161, 45–51 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidle, S., Gulde, P., Koster, R., Soaz, C. & Hermsdörfer, J. The relationship between self-reported physical frailty and sensor-based physical activity measures in older adults–a multicentric cross-sectional study. BMC geriatrics 23, 43 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pradeep Kumar, D., Najafi, B., Laksari, K. & Toosizadeh, N. Sensor-based assessment of variability in daily physical activity and frailty. Gerontology 69, 1147–1154 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Park, C., Mishra, R., Golledge, J. & Najafi, B. Digital biomarkers of physical frailty and frailty phenotypes using sensor-based physical activity and machine learning. Sensors 21, 5289 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. García-de Villa, S. et al. A database with frailty, functional and inertial gait metrics for the research of fall causes in older adults. Scientific Data 10, 566 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abedi, A., Chu, C. H. & Khan, S. S. Multimodal sensor dataset for monitoring older adults post lower limb fractures in community settings. Scientific Data 12, 733 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, L., Fischer, E., Brahms, C. M., Granacher, U. & Arnrich, B. Duo-gait: A gait dataset for walking under dual-task and fatigue conditions with inertial measurement units. Scientific data 10, 543 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Camerlingo, N. et al. Monitoring gait and physical activity of elderly frail individuals in free-living environment: A feasibility study. Gerontology 70, 439–454 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fried, L., Tangen, C. & Walston, J. i wsp. cardiovascular health study collaborative research group. frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56, M146–M156 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research 12, 189–198 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pritchard, J. et al. Measuring frailty in clinical practice: a comparison of physical frailty assessment methods in a geriatric out-patient clinic. BMC geriatrics 17, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Op het Veld, L. P. et al. Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains. BMC geriatrics 15, 1–11 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bieniek, J., Wilczyński, K. & Szewieczek, J. Fried frailty phenotype assessment components as applied to geriatric inpatients. Clinical interventions in aging 453–459 (2016).

  32. Lee, P. H., Macfarlane, D. J., Lam, T. H. & Stewart, S. M. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (ipaq-sf): A systematic review. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 8, 1–11 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bandeen-Roche, K. et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women’s health and aging studies. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61, 262–266 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Podsiadlo, D. & Richardson, S. The timed up & go: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American geriatrics Society 39, 142–148 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Amjad, A., Szczȩsna, A., Błaszczyszyn, M. & Anwar, A. Inertial measurement unit signal-based machine learning methods for frailty assessment in geriatric health. Signal, Image and Video Processing 19, 1–11 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paulich, M., Schepers, M., Rudigkeit, N. & Bellusci, G. Xsens mtw awinda: Miniature wireless inertial-magnetic motion tracker for highly accurate 3d kinematic applications. Xsens: Enschede, The Netherlands 1–9 (2018).

  37. Schepers, M., Giuberti, M. & Bellusci, G. et al. Xsens mvn: Consistent tracking of human motion using inertial sensing. Xsens Technol 1, 1–8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Database for prevalence and determinants of frailty and pre-frailty in elderly people with quantifying functional mobility. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7874411 (2025).

  39. Amjad, A. et al. Deep learning for frailty classification using imu sensor data: Insights from frailpol database. IEEE Sensors Journal (2024).

  40. Küderle, A. et al. Gaitmap—an open ecosystem for imu-based human gait analysis and algorithm benchmarking. IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology 5, 163–172 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Apsega, A. et al. Wearable sensors technology as a tool for discriminating frailty levels during instrumented gait analysis. Applied Sciences10, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238451 (2020).

  42. Pradeep Kumar, D. et al. Sensor-based characterization of daily walking: a new paradigm in pre-frailty/frailty assessment. BMC geriatrics 20, 164 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Martínez-Ramírez, A. et al. Frailty assessment based on trunk kinematic parameters during walking. Journal of Neuroengineering and rehabilitation 12, 48 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kressig, R. W. et al. Temporal and spatial features of gait in older adults transitioning to frailty. Gait & posture 20, 30–35 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morris, S., Morris, M. E. & Iansek, R. Reliability of measurements obtained with the timed up & go test in people with parkinson disease. Physical therapy 81, 810–818 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thompson, M. & Medley, A. Performance of individuals with parkinson’s disease on the timed up & go. Journal of neurologic physical therapy 22, 16–21 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bortone, I. et al. How gait influences frailty models and health-related outcomes in clinical-based and population-based studies: a systematic review. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 12, 274–297 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dapp, U., Vinyard, D., Golgert, S., Krumpoch, S. & Freiberger, E. Reference values of gait characteristics in community-dwelling older persons with different physical functional levels. BMC geriatrics 22, 713 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, X., Li, F., Hobbelen, H. S., van Munster, B. C. & Lamoth, C. J. Gait parameters and daily physical activity for distinguishing pre-frail, frail, and non-frail older adults: A scoping review. The journal of nutrition, health & aging 29, 100580 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Choi, J., Parker, S. M., Knarr, B. A., Gwon, Y. & Youn, J.-H. Wearable sensor-based prediction model of timed up and go test in older adults. Sensors 21, 6831 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was supported by the Department of Computer Graphics, Vision, and Digital Systems, under the statutory research project (Rau6, 2026), Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Graphics, Vision and Digital Systems, Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland

    Agnieszka Szczȩsna & Arslan Amjad

  2. Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, 45-758, Opole, Poland

    Monika Błaszczyszyn, Mariusz Konieczny, Zbigniew Borysiuk & Jerzy Sacha

  3. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Opole, 45-040, Opole, Poland

    Magdalena Sacha

  4. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, 45-040, Opole, Poland

    Piotr Feusette, Robert Zieliński & Piotr Wittek

  5. Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, 45-040, Opole, Poland

    Wojciech Wolański

Authors
  1. Agnieszka Szczȩsna
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arslan Amjad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monika Błaszczyszyn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Magdalena Sacha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Piotr Feusette
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robert Zieliński
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Piotr Wittek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wojciech Wolański
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mariusz Konieczny
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zbigniew Borysiuk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jerzy Sacha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: A.Sz. and M.B. Methodology: A.Sz., A.A., and M.B. Software: A.A. Formal analysis: A.Sz. Investigation: A.Sz., M.B., A.A., J.S., M.S., P.F., W.W., M.K., Z.B. Data curation: M.B., J.S., M.S., P.F., R.Z., P.W., W.W., M.K., Z.B. Writing - original draft: A.Sz. and A.A. Writing - review and editing: M.B., A.Sz., and A.A.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Agnieszka Szczȩsna or Arslan Amjad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Corresponding author A.Sz. of this work is an Editorial Board Member of Scientific Data and a Guest Editor for the “Datasets for gait analysis”.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szczȩsna, A., Amjad, A., Błaszczyszyn, M. et al. Database for Prevalence and Determinants of Frailty in the Elderly with Quantifying Functional Mobility. Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06854-8

Download citation

  • Received: 18 June 2025

  • Accepted: 09 February 2026

  • Published: 18 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06854-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Journal Metrics
  • Policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Data (Sci Data)

ISSN 2052-4463 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics