Table 5 Multiple regression model analysis of the effects of genetic polymorphism on cognitive function in schizophrenic patients by general linear model.

From: PICK1 Genetic Variation and Cognitive Function in Patients with Schizophrenia

Cognitive domain

 

rs2076369

rs3952

GT vs TT

GT vs GG

TT vs GG

AG vs GG

AG vs AA

GG vs AA

Summary score

β

5.0

0.8

−4.3

−0.01

−1.1

−1.1

95% CI

(0.3, 9.7)

(−1.8, 3.3)

(−9.1, 0.6)

(−3.2, 3.2)

(−3.7, 1.6)

(−4.7, 2.5)

p

0.038

0.565

0.087

0.997

0.428

0.562

Global composite Score

β

5.4

0.9

−4.4

−0.2

−1.0

−0.8

95% CI

(0.7, 10.1)

(−1.6, 3.5)

(−9.3, 0.4)

(−3.4, 2.9)

(−3.6, 1.7)

(−4.4, 2.9)

p

0.025

0.470

0.074

0.892

0.473

0.682

Neuro-cognitive composite score

β

4.8

0.7

−4.1

0.2

−0.8

−1.0

95% CI

(0.1, 9.5)

(−1.8, 3.3)

(−9.0, 0.8)

(−3.0, 3.4)

(−3.5, 1.8)

(−4.6, 2.6)

p

0.046

0.569

0.102

0.914

0.540

0.585

1. Speed of processing

β

4.8

1.2

−3.6

−0.3

0.1

0.3

95% CI

(−0.003, 9.7)

(−1.4, 3.8)

(−8.6, 1.4)

(−3.5, 3.0)

(−2.6, 2.8)

(−3.4, 4.1)

p

0.050

0.357

0.157

0.877

0.952

0.858

Category Fluency

β

5.3

0.2

−5.1

1.3

−0.5

−1.8

95% CI

(0.4, 10.2)

(−2.5, 2.8)

(−10.2, −0.03)

(−2.0, 4.6)

(−3.3, 2.3)

(−5.6, 2.0)

p

0.036

0.910

0.049

0.444

0.738

0.359

Trail Making A

β

−0.7

1.3

2.0

−1.7

2.1

3.8

95% CI

(−5.7, 4.2)

(−1.4, 4.0)

(−3.1, 7.2)

(−5.0, 1.7)

(−0.7, 4.9)

(0.03, 7.6)

p

0.773

0.334

0.433

0.321

0.132

0.048

WAIS-III,Digit Symbol Coding

β

5.5

1.1

−4.4

−0.1

−1.5

−1.4

95% CI

(0.7, 10.2)

(−1.5, 3.7)

(−9.3, 0.5)

(−3.3, 3.1)

(−4.2, 1.2)

(−5.0, 2.3)

p

0.025

0.413

0.080

0.933

0.273

0.464

2. Attention: CPT-IP

β

0.3

−1.7

−2.0

0.2

−1.7

−1.9

95% CI

(−4.6, 5.2)

(−4.4, 1.0)

(−7.1, 3.1)

(−3.1, 3.5)

(−4.4, 1.1)

(−5.6, 1.9)

p

0.901

0.206

0.434

0.899

0.238

0.328

3. Working Memory

β

5.2

1.8

−3.4

−0.7

−0.3

0.4

95% CI

(0.6, 9.7)

(−0.7, 4.2)

(−8.1, 1.3)

(−3.7, 2.4)

(−2.9, 2.3)

(−3.1, 3.8)

p

0.027

0.163

0.155

0.681

0.825

0.843

Backward digit span

β

3.9

0.9

−3.0

0.4

−0.2

−0.6

95% CI

(−0.9, 8.6)

(−1.7, 3.4)

(−7.9, 1.9)

(−2.8, 3.6)

(−2.9, 2.5)

(−4.2, 3.1)

p

0.111

0.517

0.228

0. 821

0.879

0.757

WMS-III-Spatial Span (backward)

β

5.0

2.1

−2.8

−1.5

−0.3

1.2

95% CI

(0.4, 9.6)

(−0.4, 4.6)

(−7.6, 2.0)

(−4.6, 1.7)

(−2.9, 2.3)

(−2.4, 4.7)

p

0.035

0.092

0.246

0.356

0.829

0.515

4. Verbal Learning and memory: WMS-III, word listing

β

1.3

−0.3

−1.6

−0.7

−1.6

−0.9

95% CI

(−3.3, 5.8)

(−2.8, 2.1)

(−6.3, 3.1)

(−3.7, 2.4)

(−4.1, 1.0)

(−4.4, 2.6)

p

0.583

0.801

0.507

0.660

0.229

0.618

5. Visual learning and memory: WMS-III, visual reproduction

β

3.6

0.2

−3.3

1.4

−1.0

−2.4

95% CI

(−1.3, 8.5)

(−2.4, 2.9)

(−8.4, 1.7)

(−1.9, 4.7)

(−3.8, 1.8)

(−6.2, 1.3)

p

0.153

0.859

0.197

0.392

0.483

0.205

6. Reasoning and problem solving: WISC-III, Maze

β

2.0

0.3

−1.8

1.6

0.1

−1.6

95% CI

(−2.6, 6.6)

(−2.2, 2.7)

(−6.5, 3.0)

(−1.5, 4.7)

(−2.5, 2.6)

(−5.1, 2.0)

p

0.388

0.845

0.464

0.307

0.972

0.384

7. Social cognition: The Managing emotions branch of MSCEIT

β

5.3

1.5

−3.8

−2.2

−1.2

1.1

95% CI

(0.6, 10.0)

(−1.1, 4.0)

(−8.7, 1.0)

(−5.4, 1.0)

(−3.8, 1.5)

(−2.6, 4.7)

p

0.028

0.262

0.123

0.171

0.393

0.567

  1. All data were standardized to T scores.
  2. β = Estimated Coefficient, 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.
  3. P-value was based on the multiple regression model analysis of cognitive function between genetic groups by General linear model (GLM). We ran our model to fit both polymorphisms in the same model to correct the influence by the other polymorphism; in addition, we also included age, gender and years of education in the model.