Table 1 Comparison of the analytical performance of the S-rGO/CuS sensor electrode with previously reported non-enzymatic glucose sensor electrodes.

From: Sonochemical Synthesis of Sulfur Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported CuS Nanoparticles for the Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensor Applications

Electrode

Potential (V)

Sensitivity (µA mM−1 cm−2)

Linear range (up to, mM)

Detection limit (µM)

ref

Cu-CuO nanowire

0.3

—

12

500

37

CuO nanorods-graphite

0.60

371.4

8.0

4.0

38

CuO nanospheres

0.60

404.5

2.6

1.0

39

Cu2S nanocrystal-DWCNT/GCE

0.5

35

11.7

1.0

40

CuO nanocubes/graphene

0.59

1360

4

0.7

41

CuO nanoplatelets

0.55

3490.7

0.8

0.5

42

Copper nanocluster- carbon nanotubes

0.65

251.4

3.5

0.21

43

Cu2O nanospindle/MWCNTs

0.4

2143

2.5

0.2

44

CuO nanowires

0.33

0.49

2.0

0.049

45

CuS

0.45

3135

2.5

0.045

13

Sphere-like CuS microcrystals

—

117.3

12

0.015

46

CuS nanotubes

—

11100

0.005

—

47

S-rGO/CuS

0.48

429.4

20.17

0.032

This work

Back to article page