Table 1 Comparison with pH sensing devices composed of various membranes with different treatments.
Sensing membrane | pH sensitivity (mV/pH) | Hysteresis voltage (mV) | Drift rate (mV/h) |
|---|---|---|---|
ZnO with RTA | 42.54 | 7.37 | 1.78 |
Nb2O5 with CF4 | 52.15 | 5.22 | 3.34 |
Gd2O3 with RTA | 48.29 | 5.8 | 2.2 |
Gd2TiO7 with RTA | 55.27 | 3.6 | 1.37 |
CeO2 | 34.37 | 27.7 | 9.91 |
CeO2 with NH3 | 48.62 | 7.8 | 0.51 |
Ce2Ti2O7 | 37.79 | 20.8 | 5.81 |
Ce2Ti2O7 with NH3 | 52.43 | 5.6 | 0.21 |