Figure 1

2-D proteome map of the common differentially expressed proteins that were consistent in all four pairs of EUU vs. EUK isolates. (A) Representative 2-D gel of EUU isolates. (B) Representative 2-D gel of EUK isolates. The circles indicate proteins that were predominant in EUK, whereas a rectangle localizes protein that was predominant in EUU group. These common differences were then subjected to protein identification by nanoLC-MS/MS analysis (see Table 2). (C) 3-D zoom-in images demonstrating differential intensity volumes of spot no. 120, which was identified as EF-Tu, in EUU compared to EUK in all four antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.