Table 2 The prediction accuracy of fruit form based on haploinsufficiency model and genotypes of assayed samples.
Accession | N | Predicted fruit form | Observed fruit form | Observed genotype | Accuracy (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D | T | P | D | T | P | D | T | P | |||
AVROS | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | (T/T, A/A) | (T/T, T/A) | (T/T, T/T) | 72.00 |
*Nigerian × AVROS | 281 | 69 | 206 | 6 | 69 | 206 | 6 | (T/T, A/A) | (C/T, A/A) & (T/T, T/A) | (C/T, T/A), (C/C, A/A) & (T/T, T/T) | 100.00 |
*Cameroon × Congo | 57 | 13 | 29 | 15 | 12 | 29 | 16 | (T/T, A/A) | (C/T, A/A) & (T/T, T/A) | (C/T, T/A), (C/C, A/A) & (T/T, T/T) | 96.00 |
*Deli-Nigerian × URT- Calabar | 95 | 11 | 84 | 0 | 11 | 84 | 0 | (T/T, A/A) | (C/T, A/A) & (T/T, T/A) | 100.00 | |
*URT × Calabar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | (C/T, T/A) | 100.00 | ||
MPOB | 136 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 136 | 0 | 0 | (T/T, A/A) | 100.00 | ||
Tanzanian | 131 | 97 | 33 | 1 | 97 | 33 | 1 | (T/T, A/A) | (T/T, T/A) | (T/T, T/T) | 100.00 |
Congo | 40 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 6 | (T/T, A/A) | (T/T, T/A) | (T/T, T/T) | 100.00 |
