Table 3 The prediction accuracy of fruit form based on haploinsufficiency model and genotypes of five discrepancies and eight controls tested in the second validation set.

From: Characterizing haploinsufficiency of SHELL gene to improve fruit form prediction in introgressive hybrids of oil palm

Sample ID

Accession

Sh MPOB2

Sh MPOB4

Sh MPOB

Sh AVROS

Sh MPOB3

Predicted Fruit Form

Observed Fruit Form

Accuracy

V907

*Cameroon × Congo

A/A

A/A

T/T

A/A

C/C

D

D

Concordant

V670

*Congo

A/A

A/A

T/T

A/A

C/C

D

D

Concordant

V749

*MPOB

A/A

A/A

T/T

A/A

C/C

D

D

Concordant

V121

*Nigerian × AVROS

A/A

T/A**

C/T**

T/A**

C/C

P

P

Concordant

V152

*Tanzanian

A/A

A/A

T/T

T/T***

C/C

P

P

Concordant

V685

*Congo

A/A

A/A

T/T

T/T***

C/C

P

P

Concordant

V646

*Congo

A/A

A/A

T/T

T/A**

C/C

T

T

Concordant

V086

*Nigerian × AVROS

A/A

A/A

C/T**

A/A

C/C

T

T

Concordant

C2

AVROS

C/A**

A/A

T/T

A/A

C/C

T

T

Corrected

C1

AVROS

C/A**

A/A

T/T

T/A**

C/C

P

P

Corrected

C3

AVROS

C/A**

A/A

T/T

T/A**

C/C

P

P

Corrected

V927

Cameroon × Congo

A/A

A/A

T/T

A/A

C/C

D

T

Miss

V599

Cameroon × Congo

A/A

A/A

C/T a

A/A

C/C

T

P

Miss

  1. *Control samples tested using M1 and M2 in the second validation set. D – dura; T – tenera; P – pisifera. Highlighted genotype indicated the presence of mutation (**heterozygous; ***homozygous).