Table 2 Results of the model selection for the GLMs modeling the presence of pesticides in the pollen vs the abundance of different pollen taxa.

From: The challenges of predicting pesticide exposure of honey bees at landscape level

 

Boscalid

 

Pyrimethanil

 

Dimethoate

w

coef

se

w

coef

se

w

coef

se

Intcpt

1

−2.760

1.456

Intcpt

1

−4.179

2.274

Intcpt

1

−3.413

1.614

ros

0.834

0.323

0.158

SepOct

0.959

−3.282

1.288

vic

0.996

0.822

0.269

pha

0.715

0.206

0.119

bra

0.952

0.747

0.341

pha

0.768

0.296

0.160

tar

0.538

0.173

0.132

ivy

0.250

0.002

0.064

ros

0.388

0.109

0.116

bal

0.433

−0.108

0.102

tar

0.248

0.028

0.071

tar

0.280

0.054

0.087

vic

0.395

0.103

0.103

api

0.244

−0.021

0.067

SepOct

0.263

−0.124

0.374

ivy

0.350

0.062

0.071

pha

0.242

−0.014

0.045

api

0.261

−0.043

0.092

bra

0.332

0.056

0.066

ast

0.240

0.017

0.072

ivy

0.260

−0.027

0.061

api

0.273

0.039

0.067

tri

0.240

−0.016

0.065

tri

0.250

0.030

0.071

SepOct

0.267

−0.019

0.321

ros

0.237

0.004

0.048

ast

0.246

−0.029

0.084

ast

0.243

−0.004

0.058

vic

0.232

−0.011

0.068

bra

0.230

0.007

0.055

tri

0.231

0.002

0.042

        
  1. “w” = AICc variable weight, “coef” = models averaged coefficient, “se” = unconditional standard error. We interpreted only the explanatory variables with w > 0.60 (in bold). Intcpt = model intercept and SepOct = binary explanatory variable corresponding to the period: July/August or September/October. Abbreviation of the pollen types: api = Apiaceae, ast = Asteraceae, bal = Balsaminaceae, bra = Brassicaceae, ivy = Hedera elix, pha = Phacelia tanacetifolia, ros = Rosaceae, tar = Taraxacum spp., tri = Trifolium.
Back to article page