Table 3 Thiosulfinates contents in different vavieties garlic in different growth stages.

From: Resistance of Garlic Cultivars to Bradysia odoriphaga and Its Correlation with Garlic Thiosulfinates

Cultivars

Seeding stage

Growth stage

Matural stage

df

F

P

Qixian

23.75 ± 0.90 ab, B

19.90 ± 1.22 abc, B

30.95 ± 1.06 a, A

(2, 6)

27.55

0.001

Cangshan

25.42 ± 0.66 a, A

21.82 ± 0.99 a, B

27.32 ± 0.69 ab, A

(2, 6)

12.41

0.007

Nanfang

23.62 ± 1.11 ab, AB

20.07 ± 0.85 abc, B

25.42 ± 1.23 b, A

(2, 6)

6.44

0.032

Jinxiang

19.81 ± 0.56 bcd, B

18.87 ± 0.65 abc, B

22.47 ± 0.47 bcd, A

(2, 6)

10.97

0.010

Zajiao

23.58 ± 0.83 ab, A

18.78 ± 0.76 abc, B

23.51 ± 1.25 bc, A

(2, 6)

8.06

0.020

Sichuan

23.02 ± 1.35 ab, A

21.57 ± 1.04 ab, A

23.67 ± 1.00 bc, A

(2, 6)

0.89

0.457

Xinxiang

21.35 ± 0.79 abc, AB

18.59 ± 0.55 abc, B

23.67 ± 0.78 bc, A

(2, 6)

12.67

0.007

Zhongmu

17.65 ± 0.81 bc, A

18.06 ± 0.76 abc, A

19.54 ± 1.48 cd, A

(2, 6)

0.86

0.468

Yishui

17.47 ± 0.60 bc, A

17.64 ± 0.58 bc, A

18.27 ± 0.3 6c, A

(2, 6)

0.65

0.554

Siliuban

16.88 ± 0.93 d, A

16.78 ± 0.62 c, A

17.90 ± 0.83 c, A

(2, 6)

0.60

0.579

df

(9, 20)

(9, 20)

(9, 20)

   

F

12.30

3.86

17.34

   

P

<0.001

0.006

<0.001

   
  1. Each value represents the average (±s.e.) of three replicates. The different small letters at the first column after each datum indicate significant differences in thiosulfinates contents among cultivars (P < 0.05) in the same growth stage, and the different capital letters at the second column after each datum indicate significant differences in thiosulfinates contents among growth stages (P < 0.05) in the same garlic cultivar. Data was analyzed with ANOVA (Tukey’s HSD).