Table 3 Results from models (after backward selection) investigating how life history traits and body mass varied across the three study sites.

From: Integrated behavioural and stable isotope data reveal altered diet linked to low breeding success in urban-dwelling blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus)

Response variable

Explanatory variable

Estimate

Std. Error

z value

P value

(a) Lay date (poisson GLM)

  Intercept

3.47

0.05

72.17

<0.001

(b) Clutch size (poisson GLM)

  Intercept

2.59

0.18

14.17

<0.001

  Lay date

−0.01

0.01

−2.33

0.020

(c) Hatch date (poisson GLM)

  Intercept

3.70

0.08

44.43

<0.001

  Lay date

0.01

<0.00

4.91

<0.001

(d) Hatching success (binomial GLM)

  Intercept

1.25

0.85

1.47

0.141

  Site

−0.55

0.23

−2.36

0.018

(e) Fledging success (binomial GLM)

  Intercept

11.43

2.03

5.62

<0.001

  Site

−5.95

1.02

−5.85

<0.001

(f) Number of fledglings (poisson GLM)

  Intercept

2.68

0.15

17.99

<0.001

  Site

−1.01

0.10

−10.14

<0.001

(g) Nestling body mass at day 13 (LMM)

  Intercept

12.11

0.35

34.26

<0.001

  Site

−0.91

0.20

−4.49

<0.001

(f) Adult body mass (LMM)

  Intercept

11.27

0.48

23.22

<0.001

  1. Lay date, clutch size, hatch date and number of fledglings were modelled with a Poisson error structure, hatching success (number of hatchlings over laid eggs) and fledging success (number of fledglings over number of hatchlings), were modelled with a binomial error structure, while adult and nestling body mass were modelled with a Gaussian error structure in LMMs with nestbox included as random factor. Site was included in all models as main fixed effect, whereas date of first egg of each nest was included as covariate to control for seasonal variation in reproductive timing and body mass (except for the model testing for variation in lay date across sites). For adult body mass, sex was also included as fixed factor. These were dropped if not significant via backward selection (only significant variables are shown).