Table 3 Statistically significant associations between TAS genes polymorphisms and wine descriptors.
From: Association between taste receptor (TAS) genes and the perception of wine characteristics
Bitterness | Czech Republic | Italy | Czech Republic and Italy | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chr.7 | Gene | SNP | Model | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value |
TAS2R38 | rs10246939 | C/T vs C/C | −0.90 | (−1.78; −0.01) | 0.05 | −0.06 | (−0.96; 0.84) | 0.90 | −0.54 | (−1.17; 0.09) | 0.10 | |
T/T vs C/C | −1.12 | (−2.11; −0.14) | 0.03 | −0.97 | (−1.96; 0.02) | 0.06 | −1.08 | (−1.78; −0.38) | 0.003 | |||
rs1726866 | T/C vs C/C | −1.06 | (−1.94; −0.19) | 0.02 | −0.07 | (−0.97; 0.83) | 0.89 | −0.63 | (−1.27; −0.001) | 0.05 | ||
T/C vs C/C | −1.16 | (−2.13; −0.18) | 0.02 | −0.94 | (−1.94; 0.05) | 0.06 | −1.10 | (−1.80; −0.40) | 0.002 | |||
rs713598 | G/C vs C/C | −0.71 | (−1.67; −0.26) | 0.15 | 0.08 | (−0.87; 1.03) | 0.87 | −0.34 | (−1.02; 0.34) | 0.33 | ||
G/G vs C/C | −0.91 | (−1.93–0.10) | 0.08 | −0.51 | (−1.51; 0.50) | 0.32 | −0.75 | (−1.46; −0.03) | 0.04 | |||
Sourness | Czech Republic | Italy | Czech Republic and Italy | |||||||||
Chr.7 | Gene | SNP | Model | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value |
TAS2R16 | rs6466849 | A/G vs G/G | 1.20 | (0.50; 1.91) | 0.001 | 0.61 | (−0.14; 1.35) | 0.11 | 0.94 | (0.43; 1.46) | 0.0003 | |
A/A vs G/G | −0.75 | (−2.56; 1.05) | 0.41 | −5.11 | (−9.93; 0.28) | 0.04 | −1.30 | (−2.94; 0.34) | 0.12 | |||
Astringency | Czech Republic | Italy | Czech Republic and Italy | |||||||||
Chr.1 | Gene | SNP | Model | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value | Coef. | 95% CI | P-value |
TAS1R2 | rs4920566 | G/A vs G/G | 0.29 | (−0.38; 0.96) | 0.40 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
A/A vs G/G | −1.24 | (−1.97; −0.50) | 0.001 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |||
