Table 3 Accuracies for barcoding in Longidoridae using SPIDER package and tree-based comparison for monophyly using Bayesian inference.
Dataset | Number of species | Number of sequences | Near Neighbour | Best Close Match1 | Sequences with inter-intra < = 0 | Optimal differences for barcoding2 | MrBayes phylogeny3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
False | True | Ambiguous | Correct | Incorrect | No id | ||||||
Cytochrome oxidase 1 | 42 | 253 | 3 | 250 (99.9%) | 0 | 189 (74.7%) | 2 | 62 | 58 (22.9%) | 6.36% | 92.9% (39/42) |
D2 and D3 expansion segments of the 28S4 | 111 | 560 | 24 | 536 (95.7%) | 18 | 503 (89.8%) | 19 | 20 | 138 (24.7%) | 2.87% | 90.1% (100/111) |
D2 and D3 expansion segments of the 28S (excluding X. americanum-group) | 88 | 384 | 11 | 373 (99.9%) | 7 | 354 (92.2%) | 6 | 17 | 37 (9.6%) | 2.04% | 100% (88/88) |