Table 1 Linguistic features of the action and neutral texts.

From: A moving story: Whole-body motor training selectively improves the appraisal of action meanings in naturalistic narratives

 

Action Text 1

Neutral Text 1

Action Text 2

Neutral Text 2

p-value

Charactersa

696

743

693

668

0.241#

Words

167

169

164

153

0.816#

Nouns

33

25

28

22

0.485#

Adjectives

6

14

5

14

0.058#

Adverbs

6

16

9

10

0.161#

Verbs

32

32

32

31

0.999 #

Action verbs

25 (78.1%)

11 (34.4%)

25 (78.1%)

9 (29%)

0.004 #

Non-action verbs

7 (21.9%)

21 (65.6%)

7 (21.9%)

22 (71%)

0.002 #

Mean content word frequencyb,c

803

974.6

926.4

1014

0.857*

Mean content word familiarityb,d

593.2

582.4

598.6

598.3

0.419*

Mean content word imageabilityb,e

442.8

394.9

440.2

399.1

0.060*

Mean content word syllabic lengthb

1.3

1.5

1.3

1.4

0.156*

Mean content word orthographic lengthb

4.8

5.1

4.8

4.8

0.680*

Sentences

17

17

17

17

0.999#

Minor sentences

0

0

0

0

0.999#

Sentences with parataxis only

3

3

3

5

0.835#

Sentences with hypotaxis only

4

3

3

1

0.630#

Sentences with parataxis and hypotaxis

3

3

4

2

0.881#

Comprehensibility

3.9

3.6

3.25

4

0.619*

Coherence

3.7

3.6

2.75

4

0.471*

PSKF

4.4

4.55

4.22

4.39

SRI

3

2.8

3.5

2.7

  1. Notes. PSKF: Powers-Sumner-Kearl Formula; SRI: Spache Readability Index (revised).
  2. aCharacter count was performed without counting spaces.
  3. bPsycholinguistic data was extracted from N-Watch (Davis, 2005), based on lemma counts.
  4. cFrequency data was extracted from the CELEX written database, through N-Watch (Davis, 2005).
  5. dFamiliarity data was extracted from the MRC database, through N-Watch (Davis, 2005).
  6. eImageability data was extracted from the Bristol/MRC database, through N-Watch (Davis, 2005).
  7. # p-values calculated with chi-squared test.
  8. * p-values calculated with independent measures ANOVA.