Table 3 Differences in homoeolog expression bias between the allotetraploid (F18) and gynogenetic allodiploid (G4) hybrids.
Comparison | Expression in F18 | Expression in G4 | No. of genes | No. of growth genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F18 = G4 | R = C (no-HEB) | R = C Parental condition | 2,070 (58.47%) | 20 (58.82%) |
R > C (R-HEB) | R > C Parental condition | 490 (13.84%) | 4 (11.76%) | |
R < C (C-HEB) | R < C Parental condition | 149 (4.21%) | 0 | |
F18 ≠ G4 | R > C (R-HEB) | R = C No bias in progeny | 283 (7.99%) | 5 (14.71%) |
R < C (C-HEB) | R = C No bias in progeny | 137 (3.87%) | 2 (5.88%) | |
R = C (no-HEB) | R > C Novel bias in progeny | 260 (7.34%) | 2 (5.88%) | |
R = C (no-HEB) | R < C Novel bias in progeny | 143 (4.04%) | 1 (2.94%) | |
R < C (C-HEB) | R > C Novel bias in progeny | 6 (0.17%) | 0 | |
R > C (R-HEB) | R < C Novel bias in progeny | 3 (0.08%) | 0 | |
Total number of genes | 3,540 | 34 | ||
Overall R-biased in progenya | 639 (18.52%) | 5 (14.71%) | ||
Overall C-biased in progenya | 412 (11.94%) | 2 (5.88%) | ||
Potential R-biased in progenyb | 1629 (47.22%) | 17 (50.00%) | ||
Potential C-biased in progenyb | 860 (24.93%) | 10 (29.41%) |
