Table 1 Demographics and resistance profiles of clinical isolates utilized in the study.

From: The Antibacterial and Anti-inflammatory Activity of Chicken Cathelicidin-2 combined with Exogenous Surfactant for the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis-Associated Pathogens

Patient No.

Isolate No.

Sex (M/F)

Age (years)

Weight (kg)

BMI (kgm^2)

FEV1 Pred

Bacteria

Resistance Profiles

1

1

F

57

60.6

22.5

39

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

NR

2

2

M

24

72

25.3

50

Staphylococcus aureus

Clindamycin, Erythromycin R

3

3

M

50

57

19.3

43

Achromobacter xylosoxidans

Gentamicin, Meropenem, Tobramycin R; Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin I

4

4A

F

35

62

22.4

87

Staphylococcus aureus

NR

 

4B

     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc)

NR

 

4C

     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Tobramycin, Gentamicin R

5

5

F

44

59

22

73

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc)

Amikacin, Gentamicin, Meropenem, Ciprofloxacin, Tobramycin R

6

6

F

40

57

20.9

52

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc)

Gentamicin, Tobramycin R

7

7

M

37

52.5

19.3

28

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc)

NR

8

8

M

27

62

18.7

48

Staphylococcus aureus

Clindamycin, Erythromycin, Cloxacillin R

9

9A

F

31

40.5

18.2

55

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc)

NR

 

9B

     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Meropenem R; Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin I