Table 2 Linear mixed efect models with response variables, fixed effects and random effects: estimates, standard errors, *P-values, 95% confidence intervals, number of levels for the categorical variables (N Estimate) and total sample size of the model (N Total).

From: The effects of sociability on exploratory tendency and innovation repertoires in wild Sumatran and Bornean orangutans

Nr

Response

Effect

Effect type

Estimate

Std-Error

P-value

Confidence Intervals

N Estimates

N Total

2.50%

97.50%

1a

Average number of association partners

Intercept

Fixed

0.80

0.14

0.53

1.06

23

Age Class

Fixed (control)

0.16

0.14

0.210

−0.10

0.43

2

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.46

0.16

0.003

−0.71

−0.20

 

Individual

Random

17 (23)

1b

% of association time spent within 2 m

Intercept

Fixed

11.01

1.15

8.79

13.23

 

23

Age Class

Fixed (control)

−3.02

1.08

0.015

−4.87

−0.68

2

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

3.93

1.41

0.008

−6.09

−1.97

2

Individual

Random

17 (23)

2a

log(Peering events per follow hour)

Intercept

Fixed

0.52

0.22

0.10

0.94

30

Age

Fixed (control)

−0.21

0.03

<0.001

−0.27

−0.15

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

1.25

0.24

<0.001

−1.71

−0.79

2

Individual

Random

   

19

2b

sqrt(Peering events at the mother per time with mother)

Intercept

Fixed

1.06

0.07

0.95

1.22

30

Age

Fixed (control)

−0.06

0.01

<0.001

−0.08

−0.03

cont.

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.39

0.09

<0.001

−0.57

−0.26

2

Individual

Random

19

2c

log(Peering events at others per time with them)

Intercept

Fixed

0.07

0.06

−0.05

0.19

30

Age

Fixed (control)

0.07

0.03

0.005

0.02

0.12

cont.

Age2

Fixed (control)

−0.01

0.00

0.006

−0.01

0.00

cont.

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.15

0.06

0.007

−0.26

−0.04

2

Individual

Random

19

3

log(Peering events per item and time the mother was eating a specific item)

Intercept

Fixed

−1.15

0.08

−1.29

−0.99

115

Complexity

Fixed (predictor)

0.09

0.03

0.003

0.03

0.15

5

Log Freq. in mother’s diet

Fixed (predictor)

−0.47

0.07

<0.001

−0.60

−0.34

cont.

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.46

0.09

<0.001

−0.63

−0.31

2

Individual

Random

21

4a

log(Exploratory object manipulation event per hour)

Intercept

Fixed

1.38

0.33

0.75

2.01

29

Age

Fixed (control)

−0.24

0.03

<0.001

−0.30

−0.18

cont.

Sex (male)

Fixed (predictor)

0.01

0.28

0.963

−0.51

0.53

2

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.62

0.22

0.005

−1.03

−0.20

2

Individual

Random

21

4b

sqrt(Object play events per hour)

Intercept

Fixed

1.50

0.13

1.25

1.75

29

Age

Fixed (control)

−0.12

0.01

<0.001

−0.14

−0.10

cont.

Sex (male)

Fixed (predictor)

0.11

0.11

0.275

−0.14

−0.10

2

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.18

0.09

0.053

−0.35

−0.02

2

Individual

Random

 

21

5

log(Exploratory object manipulation event per hour)

Intercept

Fixed

−2.36

0.20

−2.74

−1.97

24

Age class (Indep. Imm.)

Fixed (control)

1.13

0.23

<0.001

0.68

1.57

2

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.73

0.23

0.003

−1.17

−0.28

2

Individual

Random

21

6

Exploratory object manipulation event per hour

Intercept

Fixed

0.11

0.04

0.04

0.18

46

Age class (Indep. Imm.)

Fixed (control)

0.08

0.04

0.034

0.01

0.16

2

Site (Suaq)

Fixed (predictor)

0.09

0.04

0.022

−0.16

−0.01

2

Context (Social)

Fixed (predictor)

0.08

0.04

0.023

0.01

0.16

2

Individual

Random

 

——

21

  1. *P-values were calculated via the likelihood ratio test by excluding the specific factor and comparing the reduced model to the full model.
  2. 1: Average association time with individuals other than the mother or the semi- dependent sibling (a) and percent of association time spent within wo meters of adult association partners other than the mother (b) as response variable. The factor “Age class” refers to the two classes of dependent immatures: 0–2.9 y and 3–6 y.
  3. 2 c: Peering events at individuals other than the mother per hour spent in association with at least one of those individuals as response variable.
  4. 3: Peering rate as response variable (number of peering events per item and time the mother was eating a specific food item), number of pre-ingestion processing steps of the food item (“Complexity”), frequency of the food item in the mothers diet (log transformed; “Frequency”) as effects. The N model here represents the total number of individual - age - food item combinations.
  5. 5: The effect “Age class” refers to independent immatures versus mothers.
  6. 6: The effect “Age class” refers to independent immatures versus mothers and “Context” to alone (solitary) versus social (with at least one association partner other than the own dependent or semi- dependent offspring.