Table 4 Correlation between radiographic features and lymph node status.

From: Pathologic N0 Status in Clinical T1N0M0 Lung Adenocarcinoma is Predictable by the Solid Component Proportion with Quantitative CT Number Analysis

Radiographic features

Node-positive

Node-negative

χ2/t

P

HRCT

42

306

Ā Ā 

Sizea

2.20 ± 0.51

1.90 ± 0.58

āˆ’3.143

0.002

Size stratification

Ā Ā 

9.556

0.008

   ≤1 cm

0

21

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā 1–2 cm

17

173

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā >2 cm

25

112

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Appearance

Ā Ā Ā GGO

0

52

43.980

<0.001

Ā Ā Ā PSN

4

142

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā SN

38

112

Ā Ā 

Location

Ā Ā 

4.579

0.032

Ā Ā Ā Center

12

47

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā Periphery

30

259

Ā Ā 

Contour

Ā Ā 

10.127

0.006

Ā Ā Ā Smooth

2

67

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā Lobular

20

156

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā Spiculated

20

86

Ā Ā 

Necrosis

Ā Ā 

1.482

0.223

Ā Ā Ā Yes

6

26

Ā Ā 

Ā Ā Ā No

36

280

Ā Ā 

Quantified CT number analysis

GGOc proportiona

(5 ± 6) %

(24 ± 25) %

11.522

<0.001

Sc proportiona

(82 ± 17) %

(42 ± 32) %

āˆ’12.799

<0.001

PET/CT

137

10

Ā Ā 

SUVmax

5.23 ± 2.71

3.20 ± 2.77

āˆ’3.510

0.001

  1. Note. –Unless otherwise indicated, data are number of patients. aData are means ± standard deviation. HRCT, high-resolution computer tomography; GGOc, glass-ground-opacity component; Sc, solid component; PET, positron emission tomography; SUV, standard uptake value.