Table 3 Differences in tree damage scores among provenances, with score 0 trees excluded, at (a) Site 16 and (b) Site 35.

From: A first assessment of Fraxinus excelsior (common ash) susceptibility to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (ash dieback) throughout the British Isles

(a)

NSZ

Score (%)

Count

\(\bar{{\rm{x}}}\) (1)

σ2

o

n

m

l

k

j

i

h

g

f

e

d

c

b

a

2–3

7

a

NSZ 106

21.1

6.0

1,022

3.95

1.324

          

|

|

|

|

|

b

IRL DON

23.7

3.3

1,015

3.89

1.002

       

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

c

CLARE

20.6

0.9

1,023

3.81

0.493

    

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

d

NSZ 109

25.3

2.2

1,021

3.80

1.322

    

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

e

NSZ 403

28.1

4.8

766

3.78

1.613

   

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

f

NSZ 204

26.6

7.6

1,015

3.77

2.146

   

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

 

g

DEU

26.6

3.9

990

3.74

1.882

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

 

h

NSZ 107

25.5

2.9

1,019

3.73

1.277

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

 

i

FTT SO

28.2

1.3

1,022

3.71

1.037

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

  

j

NSZ 201

31.4

3.0

1,018

3.64

1.565

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

  

k

NSZ 304

28.0

1.5

1,011

3.64

1.160

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

  

l

FRA

29.9

4.0

971

3.60

1.721

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

m

NSZ 405

32.8

0.3

1,011

3.58

0.924

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

      

n

NSZ 303

31.4

2.1

1,024

3.57

1.271

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

      

o

NSZ 302

28.6

3.2

1,011

3.57

1.586

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

      

(b)

NSZ

Score (%)

Count

\(\bar{{\bf{x}}}\) (1)

σ 2

l

k

j

i

h

g

f

e

d

c

b

a

   

2–3

7

  

a

NSZ 106

4.8

5.5

824

5.25

1.980

         

|

|

|

   

b

NSZ 107

4.5

2.8

649

5.07

2.438

   

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

   

c

NSZ 304

6.4

1.8

758

5.06

1.682

   

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

   

d

NSZ 109

7.6

1.6

784

4.95

2.109

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

e

NSZ 403

7.8

2.3

936

4.94

2.212

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

f

IRL DON

4.7

3.4

1,037

4.90

1.207

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

g

NSZ 302

5.8

3.8

955

4.88

2.781

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

h

FTT SO

9.5

3.2

864

4.86

1.938

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

i

NSZ 201

9.4

2.1

832

4.84

2.124

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

    

j

NSZ 405

9.6

2.9

985

4.80

1.709

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

      

k

NSZ 303

9.7

3.8

908

4.78

2.052

 

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

      

l

NSZ 204

6.7

1.7

873

4.43

4.096

|

              
  1. For each provenance we show: percentage of trees with score 2 and 3, percentage of healthy (score 7) trees, total number of trees, mean and variance of score, and Tukey pairwise comparison of provenances (where|signifies no significant difference at the 0.05 level). (1)NSZ not followed by | are significantly different (Tukey pairwise 5%); Excluded missing trees.
Back to article page