Table 3 Comparison of residues at the binding site of A. tumefaciens (At) OccJ and NocT and S. enteratica (Se) LAO. Residues in bold show those that are different between OccJ, NocT and LAO. * are residues interacting with the ligand through hydrophobic stacking, van der Waals contacts and/or hydrogen bonding. Residues in italics  and underlined are the binding signature for the pyruvate moiety of octopine in OccJ and the ketoacid moiety of octopine/nopaline in NocT, respectively.

From: Structural basis for high specificity of octopine binding in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens

OccJ (At)

NocT (At)

LAO (Se)

Glu30*

Glu36*

Asp11*

Tyr33*

Tyr39*

Tyr14*

Trp36

Tyr42

Phe17

Trp71*

Trp77*

Phe52*

Ala88*

Ala94*

Ser69*

Ala89*

Ala95*

Ser70*

Ser91*

Gly97*

Ser72*

Arg96*

Arg102*

Arg77*

Gly109

Thr115

Ala90

Asn111 *

Met117 *

Ser92

Gln159*

Gln165*

Leu117*

Thr162

Thr168

Ser120

Thr163*

Ser169*

Thr121*

Ala164

His170*

Gln122

Asn202*

Ser207*

Asp161*

Phe230

Phe235

Phe191