Table 2 Histopathological evaluation (hematoxylin-eosin staining).

From: Outcomes of ureteroscopy miniaturization on tissue damage and tissue hypoxia in a pig model

 

Absent

Focal

Diffuse

Severe

L

Wil.+

Effect size

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

C

95% CI

EPITHELIUM

Ureteral desquamation

Prox. u.

URS

3 (21.4)

11 (78.6)

0

0

1

55**

0.8

(0.5; 0.9)

m-URS

3 (21.4)

11 (78.6)

0

0

2

24.5

0.3

(0.0; 0.6)

Distal u.

URS

0

4 (28.6)

5 (35.7)

5 (35.7)

3

0**

−0.5

(−0.8; −0.1)

m-URS

1 (7.1)

10 (71.4)

2 (14.3)

1 (7.1)

4

0**

−0.5

(−0.8; −0.1)

LAMINA PROPRIA

Ureteral edema

Prox. u.

URS

4 (28.6)

8 (57.1)

2 (14.3)

0

1

45.5

0.2

(−0.2; 0.6)

m-URS

3 (21.4)

8 (57.1)

3 (21.4)

0

2

27.5

0.0

(−0.4; 0.4)

Distal u.

URS

4 (28.6)

4 (28.6)

5 (35.7)

1 (7.1)

3

16.5

−0.1

(−0.5; 0.3)

m-URS

3 (21.4)

8 (57.1)

3 (21.4)

0

4

16.5

−0.2

(−0.6; 0.2)

Ureteral infiltration

Prox. u.

URS

5 (35.7)

6 (42.9)

3 (21.4)

 

1

7

−0.1

(−0.5; 0.3)

m-URS

7 (50.0)

6 (42.9)

1 (7.1)

 

2

7

−0.1

(−0.5; 0.3)

Distal u.

URS

4 (28.6)

10 (71.4)

0

 

3

3.5

−0.3

(−0.6; 0.1)

m-URS

8 (57.1)

6 (42.9)

0

 

4

3.5

0.0

(0.4; −0.4)

Ureteral fibrosis

Prox. u.

URS

10 (71.4)

1 (7.1)

3 (21.4)

 

1

40.5

0.2

(−0.2; 0.6)

m-URS

8 (57.1)

6 (42.9)

0

 

2

28

0.3

(−0.1; 0.6)

Distal u.

URS

5 (35.7)

8 (57.1)

1 (7.1)

 

3

30

0.0

(−0.3; 0.4)

m-URS

5 (35.7)

7 (50.0)

2 (14.3)

 

4

30

0.0

(0.4; −0.4)

Ureteral congestion

Prox. u.

URS

11 (78.6)

3 (21.4)

0

 

1

6

0.2

(−0.2; 0.5)

m-URS

12 (85.7)

2 (14.3)

0

 

2

1.5

0.0

(−0.3; 0.3)

Distal u.

URS

9 (64.3)

4 (28.6)

1 (7.1)

 

3

3.5

−0.2

(−0.5; 0.1)

m-URS

12 (85.7)

2 (14.3)

0

 

4

3.5

−0.2

(−0.5; 0.1)

Ureteral bleeding

Prox. u.

URS

14 (100)

0

  

1

3

0.1

(−0.1; 0.3)

m-URS

14 (100)

0

  

2

0

0.0

(0.0; 0.0)

Distal u.

URS

12 (85.7)

2(14.3)

  

3

0

−0.1

(−0.3; 0.1)

m-URS

14 (100)

0

  

4

0

−0.1

(−0.3; 0.1)

MUSCLE LAYER

Fibrosis

Prox. u.

URS

12 (85.7)

2 (14.3)

  

1

7.5

0.1

(−0.2; 0.4)

m-URS

11 (78.6)

3 (21.4)

  

2

9

0.1

(−0.3; 0.4)

Distal u.

URS

10 (71.4)

4 (28.6)

  

3

10.5

0.0

(−0.3; 0.3)

m-URS

10 (71.4)

4 (28.6)

  

4

10.5

−0.1

(−0.4; 0.3)

  1. Wil.+: Wilcoxon positive range statistic. C. Cliff’s delta. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval for Cliff’s delta. L: Legend, comparison between 1; Distal u. URS vs Prox. u. URS, 2; Distal u. m-URS vs Prox. u. m-URS, 3; Distal u. URS vs Distal u. m-URS,
  2. 4; Distal u. URS - Prox. u. Baseline URS vs Distal u. m-URS – Prox. u. m-URS, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.