Figure 4

Hub identification: The degree of dlPFCl is reduced after sadness. Degree (left panels) and participation coefficient (right panels) analysis applying a threshold of 35% to the correlation matrices of each subject. (A) During the Neutral-WM1 paradigm 5 regions were identified as hubs (green bars): IPSr, IPSl, dlPFCl, mFPl and mSFGl. Their participation coefficients were above the mean, so they were classified as connector hubs. (B) During the Sadness-WM2 paradigm 3 regions were identified as hubs (green bars): IPSr, IPSl, mFPr, which were classified as connector hubs. Note that the ordering of areas is the same as in (A). (C) The dlPFCl was the only hub that presented a significant decrease in the degree from Neutral-WM1 to Sadness-WM2 and a marginally-significant decrease in participation coefficient. Error bars mark SEM.