Table 2 Time-window analyses for sentence context biased toward dominant meaning of homophones with different word probes.

From: Processing Homophones Interactively: Evidence from eye-movement data

Time window (relative to target onset)

Means

ANOVA

Semantically related to dominant meaning

Semantically related to subordinate meaning

Phonologically similar to target homophone

Unrelated to target homophones

−60~0 ms

0.28

0.19

0.23

0.18

F1(3, 116) = 3.4 p = 0.02

F2(3, 116) = 2.4 p = 0.069

0~60 ms

0.29

0.20

0.21

0.18

F1(3, 116) = 3.9 p = 0.01

F2(3, 116) = 3.2 p = 0.027

60~120 ms

0.31

0.17

0.21

0.15

F1(3, 116) = 7.8 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 7.0 p < 0.001

120~180 ms

0.32

0.16

0.20

0.17

F1(3, 116) = 9.2 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 9.0 p < 0.001

180~240 ms

0.34

0.17

0.21

0.17

F1(3, 116) = 10.1 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 10.7 p < 0.001

240~300 ms

0.34

0.17

0.20

0.19

F1(3, 116) = 11.2 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 11.5 p < 0.001

300~360 ms

0.35

0.17

0.21

0.19

F1(3, 116) = 12.7 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 14.1 p < 0.001

360~420 ms

0.36

0.17

0.22

0.19

F1(3, 116) = 10.8 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 15.5 p < 0.001

420~480 ms

0.34

0.16

0.21

0.20

F1(3, 116) = 10.0 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 13.4 p < 0.001

480~540 ms

0.33

0.17

0.22

0.19

F1(3, 116) = 8.0 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 11.6 p < 0.001

540~600 ms

0.34

0.18

0.21

0.18

F1(3, 116) = 8.8 p < 0.001

F2(3, 116) = 10.9 p < 0.001