Table 3 QTL effects estimated by averaging over effects of participation single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) on heading date (HD) in the spring and the fall.

From: Analysis of QTLs on heading date based on single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza Sativa L.)

QTLa

Marker

Position (cM)b

SSSL involvedc

Effect estimated (days)d

The spring

The fall

qHd1-1

RM462

0.5

s1-1

−2.0e

2.9

qHd1-2

RM490–RM259

32.4–38.8

s1-6, s1-8, s1-9, s1-10

−3.4

−2.7

qHd1-3

RM246

114.1

s1-15, s1-17

−3.8

−2.3

qHd1-4

PSM423

151.0

s1-20

0.7

2.9

qHd2-1

RM525–RM497

118.1–122.8

s2-11, s2-12, s2-13

−4.5

−5.7

qHd2-2

PSM375

142.5

s2-12–s2-17

−3.1

−3.2

qHd3-1

RM60–RM231

0.5–11.5

s3-1–s3-9

−9.9

−7.1

qHd3-2

PSM381

164.4

s3-27

−4.0

−7.0

qHd4

RM559

129.6

s4-13, s4-15

3.2

4.5

qHd5-1

RM153

3.0

s5-2, s5-3

−1.4

−2.7

qHd5-2

PSM208

19.5

s5-3, s5-5, s5-7

−2.0

−3.9

qHd6-1

RM508

1.4

s6-3, s6-5

1.5

1.5

qHd6-2

RM190–RM587

7.4–10.4

s6-3, s6-7, s6-9–s6-12, s6-14, s6-29

15.2

9.5

qHd7-1

RM51–RM82

0.8–24.8

s7-1

−3.6

−2.9

qHd7-2

RM70–PSM353

80.5–81.9

s7-4, s7-5, s7-7

2.3

2.6

qHd7-3

RM234–RM18

93.9–94.7

s7-7

3.7

4.6

qHd8-1

RM547

40.2

s8-4–s8-14

16.5

8.8

qHd8-2

RM230

105.7

S8-19, s8-20

5.1

0.8

qHd9

PSM400

60.8

s9-4, s9-6

−3.1

−1.6

qHd10

RM596

35.1

s10-3, s10-4

5.7

2.3

qHd11

RM286

0.3

s11-1

−15.3

−10.1

qHd12

PSM190PSM193

95.1–109.2

s12-5, s12-6, s12-7

−1.2

1.0

  1. aQTL was nominated by qHd followed chromosomal number or -serial number. bPosition (cM) indicated the positions of QTL on chromosomes. csi-j represented jth SSSL on chromosome i. dQTL effects were showed by the effects estimated by averaging over SSSLs involved. eThe negative sign in the table indicated to shorten HD.
Back to article page