Table 3 Percentage of segments falling under each class for the four segmentation configurations of TableĀ 1.

From: A generalised framework for detailed classification of swimming paths inside the Morris Water Maze

Ā 

Segmentation I

Segmentation II

Segmentation III

Segmentation IV

Thigmotaxis

27.7%

24.0%

24.6%

22.5%

Incursion

19.0%

18.9%

20.6%

17.0%

Scanning

10.2%

12.3%

10.5%

11.9%

Focused Search

9.2%

8.9%

8.2%

10.0%

Chaining Response

4.5%

5.8%

5.5%

9.8%

Self Orienting

7.1%

8.8%

8.2%

8.4%

Scanning Surroundings

17.4%

15.8%

16.8%

12.9%

Target Scanning

4.9%

5.6%

5.6%

7.4%

Unclassified

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

  1. Some differences among the four segmentations are visible although based on the results of Fig.Ā 5 consistency on the conclusions is preserved in segmentations II, III and IV. Regarding segmentation I, where there is no indication of any difference between the two animal groups regarding the Chaining Response strategy,;more segments are identified as Thigmotaxis and Scanning Surroundings. This indicates the possibility that some segments which transit between Chaining Response and one of these strategies are classified either as Thigmotaxis or Scanning Surroundings.