Figure 1
From: Enhanced spatial focusing increases feature-based selection in unattended locations

Experimental design. (a) Experiment 1. Subjects attended to the bicoloured circle in the left VF (dashed line = spatial focus of attention, FOA) and reported by button press whether the half containing the target colour had a convex or concave shape. The simultaneously presented unattended probe (here: red) in the right VF could either be identical to the target colour (match trial, M) or differ from it (non-match trial, NM). Target colour (red, magenta or blue) was assigned blockwise, probe colour (red, magenta or blue) and distractor colour (yellow, green or grey) changed from trial to trial. (b) Experiment 2, placeholder present condition. Subjects attended to the bicoloured circle in the left VF and reported by button press whether its left or right half was drawn in the target colour. Target, probe and distractor colour assignment was as in Experiment 1. To better anchor the subjects’ spatial attention to the location of the upcoming target, the outline of the upcoming bicoloured circle was presented prior to target onset. On half of the trial blocks, the outline presentation was replaced by a blank screen with fixation cross only (placeholder absent condition, not shown here). (c) Derivation of GFBA effects. Effects of global feature-based attention (GFBA) were assessed by comparing brain responses to a colour probe (contralateral activity) as a function of whether it currently matched the attended target colour, or not. The M-NM difference served as an index of GFBA. ERMF waveforms show the averaged signal of influx (blue field lines) and efflux (red field lines, polarity inverted prior averaging) magnetic field maxima.