Table 5 Potential of Panicum maximum biomass receiving various treatments for bioethanol production.

From: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase producing beneficial rhizobacteria ameliorate the biomass characters of Panicum maximum Jacq. by mitigating drought and salt stress

Treatments

Drought

Salt

Cellulose and Hemicellulose (μg/g)$

Total Reducing Sugar (μg/g)@

Ethanol Yield* (ml/100 g dry biomass)

% Conversion

Cellulose and Hemicellulose (μg/g)$

Total Reducing sugar (μg/g)@

Ethanol Yield* (ml/100 g dry biomass)

% Conversion

N

459.84 ± 4.1a

359.84 ± 5.1a

23.29737

78.25331

459.84 ± 32.7a

359.84 ± 18.1a

23.29737

78.25331

C

333.3 ± 21.4e

233.3 ± 7.5f

15.10471

69.997

241.56 ± 3.8f

141.56 ± 14.1h

9.165118

58.60242

4F11

370.44 ± 16.9de

270.44 ± 11.9e

17.50929

73.00508

381.24 ± 11.9bcd

281.24 ± 16.5bc

18.20852

73.7698

20B

434.88 ± 19.0abc

334.88 ± 11.1ab

21.68137

77.00515

397.32 ± 11.0b

297.32 ± 8.6b

19.2496

74.83137

5C

386.4 ± 20.0bcde

286.4 ± 10.5de

18.5426

74.12008

390.36 ± 13.9bc

285.36 ± 18.1bc

18.47526

73.10175

7D

420.44 ± 25.5abcd

322.44 ± 6.4bc

20.87596

76.69109

381.36 ± 18.1bcd

291.36 ± 5.2b

18.86372

76.40025

14P

419.76 ± 18.8abcd

319.76 ± 15.9bc

20.70245

76.17686

376.44 ± 3.5bcd

276.44 ± 5.8bcd

17.89775

73.43534

22F2

417.6 ± 9.8abcd

327.6 ± 2.7b

21.21004

78.44828

394.8 ± 17.8b

304.8 ± 1.2b

19.73388

77.20365

18D

380.88 ± 16.8def

280.88 ± 7.1e

18.18521

73.74501

341.88 ± 22.6bcd

241.88 ± 16.2def

15.66021

70.74997

5JB

371.52 ± 23.4de

271.52 ± 9.1e

17.57921

73.08355

352.92 ± 29.2bcd

252.92 ± 8.3cdef

16.37498

71.66497

5JD

440.88 ± 20.3ab

290.88 ± 3.5cde

18.83265

65.97714

272.64 ± 10.2e

172.64 ± 8.5g

11.17735

63.3216

11-2I

416.88 ± 6.3abcd

316.88 ± 8.0bcd

20.51598

76.01228

343.2 ± 8.5bcd

243.2 ± 3.1def

15.74567

70.86247

11G

392.4 ± 12.8bcd

292.4 ± 3.1cde

18.93106

74.5158

336.84 ± 6.4cd

236.84 ± 6.2ef

15.3339

70.31231

18F

373.08 ± 7.1de

273.08 ± 13.1e

17.68021

73.1961

325.8 ± 9.8d

225.8 ± 9.0f

14.61913

69.30632

4F1

396.48 ± 4.2bcd

296.48 ± 15.9cde

19.19521

74.77805

371.88 ± 21.3bcd

271.88 ± 7.6bcde

17.60252

73.10961

  1. Values followed by different superscripts in each column are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
  2. @Total Reducing sugar (μg/g) was estimated after 2% NaOH, 121 °C, and 1 h pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis.
  3. $Cellulose and hemicellulose (μg/g) content of plants before pretreatment.
  4. *Theoretical ethanol yield (ml/100 g) was calculated from total reducing sugars after enzymatic hydrolysis, assuming that the theoretical ethanol yield for fermenting is
  5. 0.511 g per g of hexose or pentose and by multiplying with specific volume of ethanol i.e. 1.267 ml per g (Vogel et al.56).
Back to article page