Table 2 Results of the statistical analysis of the d′ data obtained in the labelling task, for isolated sweep rates (shown in the top panels of Figs 1 and 2).
From: A tonal-language benefit for pitch in normally-hearing and cochlear-implanted children
Sweep rate (semitones/sec) | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
language | F(1,156) = 21.1 *p < 0.001 | F(1,160) = 35.3 *p < 0.001 | F(1,166) = 49.7 *p < 0.001 | F(1,168) = 37.3 *p < 0.001 | ||||
hearing | F(1,156) = 49.4 *p < 0.001 | F(1,160) = 81.6 *p < 0.001 | F(1,166) = 209.3 *p < 0.001 | F(1,168) = 157.7 *p < 0.001 | ||||
language × hearing | F(1,156) = 12.9 *p < 0.001 | F(1,160) = 10.9 *p = 0.001 | F(1,166) = 30.6 *p < 0.001 | F(1,168) = 19.4 *p < 0.001 | ||||
NH-US vs. NH-Taiwan | t(60) = 0.9, p = 0.346 | t(93) = 2.0, *p = 0.045 | F(1,156) = 41.7 *p < 0.001 | F(1,160) = 51.7 *p < 0.001 | F(1,166) = 93.3 *p < 0.001 | F(1,168) = 64.6 *p < 0.001 | ||
CI-US vs. CI-Taiwan | F(1,156) = 0.4 p = 0.519 | F(1,160) = 3.0 p = 0.087 | F(1,166) = 1.0 p = 0.321 | F(1,168) = 1.3 p = 0.260 | t(75) = 4.6, *p < 0.001 | t(75) = 3.5, *p = 0.001 |
