Table 3 Results of the statistical analysis of the d′ data obtained in the discrimination task, for isolated sweep rates (shown in the bottom panels of Figs 1 and 2).
From: A tonal-language benefit for pitch in normally-hearing and cochlear-implanted children
Sweep rate (semitones/sec) | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
language | F(1,130) = 8.7 *p = 0.004 | F(1,132) = 20.8 *p < 0.001 | F(1,135) = 14.1 *p < 0.001 | F(1,137) = 25.7 *p < 0.001 | ||||
hearing | F(1,130) = 49.7 *p < 0.001 | F(1,132) = 111.0 *p < 0.001 | F(1,135) = 163.7 *p < 0.001 | F(1,137) = 138.9 *p < 0.001 | ||||
language × hearing | F(1,130) = 6.5 *p = 0.012 | F(1,132) = 6.6 *p = 0.011 | F(1,135) = 9.7 *p = 0.002 | F(1,137) = 7.8 *p = 0.006 | ||||
NH-US vs. NH-Taiwan | t(52) = 0.5, p = 0.654 | t(81) = 1.3, p = 0.194 | F(1,130) = 22.2 *p < 0.001 | F(1,132) = 36.8 *p < 0.001 | F(1,135) = 33.7 *p < 0.001 | F(1,137) = 43.8 *p < 0.001 | ||
CI-US vs. CI-Taiwan | F(1,130) < 0.1 p = 0.808 | F(1,132) = 1.5 p = 0.223 | F(1,135) = 0.2 p = 0.696 | F(1,137) = 2.0 p = 0.161 | t(57) = 0.4, p = 0.660 | t(57) = 0.7, p = 0.507 |
