Table 2 Genetic diversity indices (H_o, H_e, A_r), inbreeding coefficient (F), relatedness (r) for regional aggregations and the entire cluster.

		N	H _o	H _e	F	r	A _r	N_e
Entire Cluster		268	0.733	0.785	0.068	−0.004	4.99	1025.8 (669.8–2049)
								2139 (1694–2964)
Regional Aggregations								% suitable habitat in 30-km buffer
1*	Ventura	10	0.747	0.684	−0.101	0.153	4.13	9.15
2*	Palos Verdes	5	0.705	0.655	−0.089	0.130	4.05	2.94
3*	Coyote Hills	10	0.768	0.713	−0.076	0.081	4.50	9.04
4*	San Dimas - Chino Hills	22	0.686	0.722	0.043	0.078	4.60	6.93
5	Redlands	5	0.653	0.654	−0.006	0.078	4.37	4.37
6	Northwestern Riverside	11	0.733	0.750	−0.023	0.034	4.73	11.43
7	Southwestern Riverside	12	0.784	0.759	−0.034	0.010	5	10.82
8	Santa Ana Mountains	27	0.733	0.743	0.020	0.049	4.79	19.43
9*	San Joaquin Hills	36	0.751	0.758	0.008	0.033	4.70	22.67
10	South Camp Pendleton	35	0.746	0.779	0.047	−0.006	4.97	32.00
11	Northwest San Diego	11	0.766	0.764	−0.005	−0.006	4.86	21.32
12	San Pasqual	10	0.692	0.733	0.073	0.031	4.71	10.32
13	Cardiff - Los Penasquitos	16	0.712	0.742	0.033	0.039	4.89	14.04
14	Mission Trails	6	0.596	0.681	0.129	0.061	4.52	16.07
15	Lakeside	6	0.733	0.720	−0.034	0.018	4.66	12.46
16	San Diego City	8	0.731	0.741	0.012	0.014	4.81	18.00
17	Sweetwater	16	0.742	0.758	0.020	0.022	4.95	13.59
18	Otay - Jamul	22	0.733	0.771	0.050	0.002	5.02	15.99

Estimates are based on the full dataset and do not exclude close relatives. Asterisks denote regional aggregations with significantly different allele frequencies based on exact tests for population differentiaton in analyses including relatives. All other aggregations grouped together into one southern population. Effective population size estimates (N_e) are included for the entire genetic cluster, estimated with the linkage disequilibrium method⁷¹ (top) and with the Colony full likelihood method⁵⁷ (bottom).

Quick links

Search