Table 3 Set of competing generalized linear models with binomial error distribution and logit-link function explaining the Wolbachia infection status of examined beetle hosts or explaining differences in infection between two supergoups (A and B) of infected hosts on the basis of predictors described in the ‘Methods’ section.

From: Using host species traits to understand the Wolbachia infection distribution across terrestrial beetles

No

Model

k

AIC

Δ

w

infected vs uninfected

 

INTERCEPT

0

350.7

8.0

0.001

1

Dist + Trophism + Reprod

3

342.7

0.0

0.032

2

Dist + Range/Climate + Trophism + Reprod

4

342.7

0.0

0.032

3

Trophism + Reprod

2

342.9

0.2

0.029

4

Range/Climate + Trophism + Reprod

3

343.4

0.7

0.023

5

Dist + Habitat + Reprod

3

343.5

0.8

0.022

6

Dist + Reprod

2

343.6

0.9

0.021

7

Dist + Range/Climate + Habitat + Reprod

4

343.8

1.1

0.019

8

Dist + Range/Climate + Habitat + Trophism + Reprod

5

343.9

1.2

0.018

9

Trophism + Body + Reprod

3

343.9

1.2

0.017

10

Dist + Trophism + Body + Reprod

4

344.1

1.4

0.016

11

Dist + Trophism

2

344.1

1.4

0.016

12

Dist + Body + Reprod

3

344.1

1.4

0.016

13

Dist + Range/Climate + Trophism + Reprod + Mobility

5

344.1

1.4

0.016

14

Dist + Range/Climate + Trophism + Body + Reprod

5

344.2

1.5

0.015

15

Range/Climate + Trophism + Body + Reprod

4

344.4

1.7

0.014

16

Dist + Trophism + Reprod + Mobility

4

344.4

1.7

0.013

17

Dist + Habitat + Trophism + Reprod

4

344.5

1.8

0.013

18

Trophism + Reprod + Mobility

3

344.5

1.8

0.013

19

Range/Climate + Trophism + Reprod + Mobility

4

344.6

1.9

0.012

20

Dist + Habitat + Body + Reprod

4

344.6

1.9

0.012

21

Dist + Body + Reprod + Mobility

4

344.6

1.9

0.012

supergroup A vs supergroup B

 

INTERCEPT

 

126.4

3.4

0.011

1

Dist + Trophism

2

123.0

0.0

0.062

2

Dist + Habitat

2

123.1

0.1

0.059

3

Habitat

1

123.7

0.6

0.045

4

Dist + Habitat + Trophism

3

123.9

0.9

0.039

5

Dist + Range/Climate + Habitat

3

124.3

1.3

0.032

6

Dist + Habitat + Body

3

124.5

1.5

0.030

7

Dist + Habitat + Mobility

3

124.5

1.5

0.029

8

Dist + Trophism + Mobility

3

124.6

1.6

0.028

9

Range/Climate + Habitat

2

124.7

1.7

0.026

10

Dist + Habitat + Reprod

3

124.9

1.9

0.024

11

Dist + Range/Climate + Trophism

3

124.9

1.9

0.024

12

Dist + Body + Trophism

3

125.0

2.0

0.023

13

Dist + Trophism + Reprod

3

125.0

2.0

0.023

  1. Only best performed models (with Δ < 2.0) are presented. The number of predictors (k), the Akaike information criterion score (AIC), the difference between the given model and the most parsimonious model (Δ) and Akaike weight (w) are listed for each model. The models with highest (w) are marked in bold; and the best fitted model according to recommendation of Arnold (2010) are marked in italic bold.
Back to article page