Table 2 Performance in AudCue1 and AudCue2.
Significant effects | Df | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reward cue (HiRe, LoRe) × Experiment (AudCue1, AudCue2) × Monkey (M1, M2, M3) | ||||
HR | Reward cue | 1,64 | 125 | 0.00002 |
Reward cue × Monkey | 2,64 | 62 | 1.0 × 10–15 | |
Reward cue × Monkey × Experiment | 2,78 | 7.2 | 0.001 | |
ER | Reward cue × Monkey | 2,114 | 6 | 0.003 |
Reward cue × Monkey × Experiment | 2,110 | 12 | 0.00002 | |
MR | Reward cue | 1,61 | 162 | 8.0 × 10–19 |
Reward cue × Monkey | 2,62 | 54 | 2.6 × 10−14 | |
Reward cue × Monkey × Experiment | 2,73 | 8.3 | 0.0006 | |
RT | Reward cue | 1,75 | 42 | 8.5 × 10−9 |
Reward cue × Monkey | 2,75 | 21 | 5.7 × 10−8 | |
M1, AudCue1: Reward cue (HiRe, LoRe) | ||||
HR | Reward cue (Hire > LoRe) | 1,28 | 14 | 0.0008 |
ER | Reward cue (Hire > LoRe) | 1,28 | 9.2 | 0.005 |
MR | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,28 | 33 | 3.6 × 10−6 |
M2, AudCue1: Reward cue (HiRe, LoRe) | ||||
ER | Reward cue (Hire > LoRe) | 1,24 | 24 | 0.00005 |
MR | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,24 | 36 | 3.5 × 10−6 |
RT | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,24 | 8.0 | 0.009 |
M3, AudCue1: Reward cue (HiRe, LoRe) | ||||
HR | Reward cue (Hire > LoRe) | 1,14 | 80 | 3.6 × 10−7 |
MR | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,14 | 26 | 0.00003 |
RT | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,14 | 22 | 0.0003 |
M2, AudCue2: Reward cue (HiRe, LoRe) | ||||
HR | Reward cue (Hire > LoRe) | 1,13 | 5.0 | 0.044 |
MR | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,13 | 6.1 | 0.028 |
RT | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,13 | 6.2 | 0.027 |
M3, AudCue2: Reward cue (HiRe, LoRe) | ||||
HR | Reward cue (Hire > LoRe) | 1,14 | 25 | 0.0002 |
MR | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,14 | 26 | 0.0002 |
ER | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,14 | 6.1 | 0.027 |
RT | Reward cue (Hire < LoRe) | 1,14 | 20 | 0.0005 |
