Figure 2 | Scientific Reports

Figure 2

From: Distinct contributions of human posterior parietal and dorsal premotor cortex to reach trajectory planning

Figure 2

Movement performance in Experiment 1. (A,B) Exemplary reach trajectories from a single subject (left panels) and the respective movement speed profiles throughout the REACH phase (right panels) for both a “NEAR” (A) and a “FAR” (B) condition are depicted. (CG) The individual panels show our estimates of behavioral performance as a function of “TASK” and “DISTANCE” and report the influence of these factors on these estimates as well as their interaction, as was assessed by two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (n.s. not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). (C) Reaction times were significantly shorter in DRT than in CT. (D) Movement durations were significantly longer in DRT than in CT and longer for “FAR” trajectories than for “NEAR”. (E) Error sizes were constant across all conditions. F) Maximal speeds were higher for “FAR” reaches. (G) Average frequencies of fixational saccades in CUE an DELAY epochs of respective conditions. Saccades were less frequent in CT “FAR” than in all other conditions. Error bars represent SEM. See RESULTS for detailed statistics.

Back to article page