Table 3 Effects of parameters λ, α, r, l on prediction performance of BRWHNHA.
α = 0.4, r = 2, l = 1 | λ = 0.6, r = 2, l = 1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
λ | Average AUC | α | Average AUC |
0 | 0.748654 | 0 | 0.804929 |
0.1 | 0.814260 | 0.1 | 0.844848 |
0.2 | 0.844524 | 0.2 | 0.853413 |
0.3 | 0.852676 | 0.3 | 0.856242 |
0.4 | 0.855220 | 0.4 | 0.856818 |
0.5 | 0.856081 | 0.5 | 0.855095 |
0.6 | 0.856818 | 0.6 | 0.853919 |
0.7 | 0.856418 | 0.7 | 0.850477 |
0.8 | 0.856146 | 0.8 | 0.848039 |
0.9 | 0.855824 | 0.9 | 0.847697 |
1 | 0.855415 | 1 | 0.847478 |
λ = 0.6, α = 0.4, l = 1 | λ = 0.6, α = 0.4, r = 2 | ||
r | Average AUC | l | Average AUC |
0 | 0.846267 | 0 | 0.856710 |
1 | 0.852731 | 1 | 0.856818 |
2 | 0.856818 | 2 | 0.853561 |
3 | 0.856814 | 3 | 0.846865 |
4 | 0.856555 | 4 | 0.846626 |
5 | 0.856371 | 5 | 0.846505 |