Table 1 Descriptive (mean (95% CI)) and comparative statistics of each ROI pair in each cohort for the uCP vs. TD comparison.
TD cohort (n = 60) | uCP cohort (n = 26) | Wilk’s Lambda (p) | F (p) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
group*connection | main effect group | |||
Intra functional connectivity non-dominant hemisphere | 0.98 (0.47) | 1.33 (0.25) | ||
M1-PMd | 0.33 (0.05) | 0.33 (0.09) | ||
M1-PMv | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.05) | ||
M1-S1 | 0.69 (0.06) | 0.73 (0.10) | ||
Intra functional connectivity dominant hemisphere | 0.97 (0.32) | 2.73 (0.10) | ||
M1-PMd | 0.30 (0.06) | 0.39 (0.11) | ||
M1-PMv | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.14 (0.07) | ||
M1-S1 | 0.87 (0.07) | 0.85 (0.14) | ||
Inter functional connectivity Non-dom → Dom | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.12 (0.73) | ||
M1-PMd | 0.19 (0.05) | 0.27 (0.08) | ||
M1-PMv | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.06) | ||
M1-S1 | 0.40 (0.06) | 0.34 (0.07) | ||
M1-SMA | 0.32 (0.06) | 0.30 (0.09) | ||
Inter functional connectivity Dom → Non-dom | 0.94 (0.14) | 0.04 (0.85) | ||
M1-PMd | 0.22 (0.04) | 0.25 (0.07) | ||
M1-PMv | 0.01 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.08) | ||
M1-S1 | 0.38 (0.06) | 0.35 (0.07) | ||
M1-SMA | 0.29 (0.06) | 0.23 (0.07) | ||
M1-M1 | 0.47 (0.07) | 0.47 (0.09) | 0.00 (0.99) | |
