Table 1 Recommendations for addressing uncertainty in population viability analysis (PVA) for endangered species recovery planning.
Category | Recommendation |
---|---|
PVA methods | 1. Conduct comprehensive sensitivity analysis; |
2. Avoid underestimation of stochastic threat factors due to field data of limited duration; | |
3. Interpret PVA output as illuminating system behavior rather than projecting specific outcomes; | |
Recovery criteria | 4. Base recovery criteria and other conservation goals on those metrics that prove most robust to uncertainty, rather than solely on extinction probability; |
5. Address the implications of data uncertainty via use of values for recovery criteria and conservation goals that incorporate precautionary buffers; | |
6. Address uncertainty regarding the future magnitude of specific threats by specifying their alleviation via a quantitative recovery criterion or goal; | |
Policy development | 7. Establish policy guidance specifying appropriate normative thresholds, quantitative frameworks for criteria development, and best practices for determining the composition and operation of recovery teams; |
8. Strengthen scientific integrity policies to require independent peer review of adherence to PVA best practices and substantive response to reviews. |